From d323817698860f21a83c4277ebccfae1e92f91cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 19:01:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update assessments/criteria.md: formatting change

Small formatting change.
---
 assessments/criteria.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/assessments/criteria.md b/assessments/criteria.md
index 80f42b0..b16e34a 100644
--- a/assessments/criteria.md
+++ b/assessments/criteria.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Is the documentation feature complete? (i.e., each product feature is documented
 * Are there any key features which are documented but missing task documentation?
 * Is the “happy path”/most common use case documented?
 Does task and tutorial content demonstrate atomicity and isolation of concerns? (Are tasks clearly named according to user goals?)
-*If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
+* If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
 * If the product exposes an API, is there a complete reference?
 * Is content up to date and accurate?