Why:
* the TOC has fielded feedback from maintainers and TOC members, implemented changes to address issues, and needs to update our docs to reflect this.
This change address the need by:
* re-writing the triage to align with current process
* calling out the adopter form for adopter interview collection
* detail process for projects not yet ready to move
* linking the adopter interview form in the process/README
* updating process/README to inform on triaging and not-ready applications
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* Capture milestones from successful projects
provide guidance and recommendations to projects seeking to move levels
* previous PR (#997) was very out of date and had unresolvable conflicts due to repo changes
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
suggestions are grammatical, layout, punctuation, or other minor changes that do not change the content.
Co-authored-by: Lin Sun <lin.sun@solo.io>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <33327273+TheFoxAtWork@users.noreply.github.com>
Why:
* Need to introduce recommendations from the Moving Levels Task Force (mltf)
* Need to incorporate TOC adjustments and new streamline process
* previous PR had significant unresolvable merge conflicts
This change address the need by:
* Introduces Issue templates for graduation and incubation applications
* provides the TOC with a streamlined guide for due diligence
* move election-schedule into operations folder
* introduce TOC templates for DD process for improved consistentcy
* update the project process to a README reflecting these new changes
* remove older files that are no longer relevant or obsolete becuase of these changes
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* the moving levels task force provided recommendations to the TOC on improving the criteria clarity and overall process. This PR implements those recommendations based on TOC discussion.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* The TOC has a variety of operations and processes that dont exist as content in this repo. this PR begins populating those into the repo.
This change address the need by:
* Creation of an operations folder
* moving the toc-decision-process.md into the operations folder
* create the README.md that discusses the contents of the folder
* create an onboarding doc
* create a toc-chair doc
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
This commit outlines a decision making structure used by the TOC.
The current PR review and approval process has been slightly adhoc.
With this change, we can be consistent across all PRs.
This change also mirrors the current process.
Documenting this structure also sets clear expectations to PR authors
and makes the whole process more transparent to the community.
Signed-off-by: Nikhita Raghunath <nikitaraghunath@gmail.com>
Why:
* Prior language was not entirely clear
* Lacked provisions for revision in light of conference changes.
This change addresses the need by:
* defining standalone
* adding provisions and consideration to revist the freeze.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* improve transparency in comment to vote time frame
* capture the announcement process
This change addresses the need by:
* detailing the length of time public comment is open
* adding a 2 day window for converting from comment to voting
* adding announcement step at the end
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>