Why:
* the TOC has fielded feedback from maintainers and TOC members, implemented changes to address issues, and needs to update our docs to reflect this.
This change address the need by:
* re-writing the triage to align with current process
* calling out the adopter form for adopter interview collection
* detail process for projects not yet ready to move
* linking the adopter interview form in the process/README
* updating process/README to inform on triaging and not-ready applications
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Sun <lin.sun@solo.io>
Why:
* TOC members, to increase velocity, are expected to do an initial review of the project to determine if it is ready enough to continue due-diligence or if there is more work to be done.
This change address the need by:
* modifying the initial evaluation content with the new column and expectations.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* TOC members, to increase velocity, are expected to do an initial review of the project to determine if it is ready enough to continue due-diligence or if there is more work to be done.
This change address the need by:
* modifying the initial evaluation content with the new column and expectations.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
*
This change address the need by:
* correcting the interview template request with full URLs to make copy and pasting into email easier
* correcting broken links in the DD guide (with 1 spelling correction)
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* Need to introduce recommendations from the Moving Levels Task Force (mltf)
* Need to incorporate TOC adjustments and new streamline process
* previous PR had significant unresolvable merge conflicts
This change address the need by:
* Introduces Issue templates for graduation and incubation applications
* provides the TOC with a streamlined guide for due diligence
* move election-schedule into operations folder
* introduce TOC templates for DD process for improved consistentcy
* update the project process to a README reflecting these new changes
* remove older files that are no longer relevant or obsolete becuase of these changes
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* the moving levels task force provided recommendations to the TOC on improving the criteria clarity and overall process. This PR implements those recommendations based on TOC discussion.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Karena Angell