Continuing work on RUN-1907: huge set of files, but not
as intimidating as it looks.
Commit 1 of 2: mindless replace of Exit(0) with ExitCleanly()
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
There is no reason to define the same code every time in each file, just
use global nodes. This diff should speak for itself.
CleanupSecrets()/Volume() no longer call Cleanup() directly, as the
global AfterEach node will always call Cleanup() this is no longer
necessary. If one AfterEach() node fails it will still run the others.
Also always unset the CONTAINERS_CONF env vars. This prevents people
from forgetting to unset it. And fix the special CONTAINERS_CONF logic
in the system connection tests, we do not want to preserve
CONTAINERS_CONF anyway so just remove this logic.
Ginkgo orders the BeforeEach and AfterEach nodes. They will be executed
from the outer-most defined to inner-most. This means our global
BeforeEach is always first. Only then the inner one (in the Describe()
function in each file). For AfterEach it is inverted, from the inner to
the outer.
Also see https://onsi.github.io/ginkgo/#organizing-specs-with-container-nodes
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
The errcheck linter makes sure that errors are always check and not
ignored by accident. It spotted a lot of unchecked errors, mostly in the
tests but also some real problem in the code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
e2e test failures are rife with messages like:
Expected 1 to equal 0
These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader
to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers
mean.
Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I
don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way
to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that
it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at
least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see
what the error message looks like.
THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human
to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random
ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is
a reproducer of what I did:
cd test/e2e
! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first,
! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because
! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero().
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go
! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes
! in run_exit_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)',
! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same.
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
! negative, old use of BeZero()
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch
point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out
copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you
have to review is that my replacements above are sane.
UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec
to the files that don't have it:
perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}'))
UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go
UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places
UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
- When one or more containers in the Pod reports an error on an operation
report StatusConflict and report the error(s)
- jsoniter type encoding used to marshal error as string using error.Error()
- Update test framework to allow setting any flag when creating pods
- Fix test_resize() result check
Fixes#8865
Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Add the ability to prune pods for api v2,
Includes the addition of force flag, for client side prompt.
Update test suite to support this use case.
Signed-off-by: Sujil02 <sushah@redhat.com>
This path allows pod prune & pod rm to remove stopped containers in the pod before deleting the pod.
PrunePods and RemovePod should be able to remove containers without force removal of stopped pods.
Signed-off-by: Qi Wang <qiwan@redhat.com>
when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image
stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time
significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from
a tarball anymore.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Ed Santiago
Paul Holzinger
Valentin Rothberg
Jhon Honce
Daniel J Walsh
Brent Baude
Sujil02
Qi Wang