Write a BeValidJSON() matcher, and replace IsJSONOutputValid():
sed -i -e 's/Expect(\(.*\)\.IsJSONOutputValid()).To(BeTrue())/Expect(\1.OutputToString())\.To(BeValidJSON())/' test/e2e/*_test.go
(Plus a few manual tweaks)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
(Sorry, couldn't resist).
CI flakes have been coming down - thank you to everyone who has
been making them a priority.
This leaves a noisy subset that I've just been ignoring for months:
Running: podman ... -p 8080:something
...cannot listen on the TCP port: listen tcp4 :8080: bind: address already in use
Sometimes these are one-time errors resolved on 2nd try; sometimes
they fail three times, forcing CI user to hit Rerun. In all cases
they make noise in my flake logs, which costs me time.
My assumption is that this has to do with ginkgo running random
tests in parallel. Since many e2e tests simplemindedly use 8080,
collisions are inevitable.
Solution: simplemindedly replace 8080 with other (also arbitrarily
picked) numbers. This is imperfect -- it requires human developers
to pick a number NNNN and 'grep NNNN test/e2e/*' before adding
new tests, which I am 100% confident ain't gonna happen -- but
it's better than what we have now.
Side note: I considered writing and using a RandomAvailablePort()
helper, but that would still be racy. Plus, it would be a pain
to interpolate strings into so many places. Finally, with this
hand-tooled approach, if/when we _do_ get conflicts on port NNNN,
it should be very easy to grep for NNNN, find the offending tests
that reuse that port, and fix one of them.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
e2e test failures are rife with messages like:
Expected 1 to equal 0
These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader
to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers
mean.
Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I
don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way
to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that
it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at
least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see
what the error message looks like.
THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human
to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random
ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is
a reproducer of what I did:
cd test/e2e
! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first,
! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because
! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero().
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go
! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes
! in run_exit_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)',
! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same.
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
! negative, old use of BeZero()
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch
point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out
copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you
have to review is that my replacements above are sane.
UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec
to the files that don't have it:
perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}'))
UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go
UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places
UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
- When one or more containers in the Pod reports an error on an operation
report StatusConflict and report the error(s)
- jsoniter type encoding used to marshal error as string using error.Error()
- Update test framework to allow setting any flag when creating pods
- Fix test_resize() result check
Fixes#8865
Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
Make sure we pass the ip and mac address as CNI_ARGS to
the cnitool which is executed in the rootless-cni-infra
container.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
We had a field for this in the inspect data, but it was never
being populated. Because of this, `podman pod inspect` stopped
showing port bindings (and other infra container settings). Add
code to populate the infra container inspect data, and add a test
to ensure we don't regress again.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
In `podman inspect` output for containers and pods, we include
the command that was used to create the container. This is also
used by `podman generate systemd --new` to generate unit files.
With remote podman, the generated create commands were incorrect
since we sourced directly from os.Args on the server side, which
was guaranteed to be `podman system service` (or some variant
thereof). The solution is to pass the command along in the
Specgen or PodSpecgen, where we can source it from the client's
os.Args.
This will still be VERY iffy for mixed local/remote use (doing a
`podman --remote run ...` on a remote client then a
`podman generate systemd --new` on the server on the same
container will not work, because the `--remote` flag will slip
in) but at the very least the output of `podman inspect` will be
correct. We can look into properly handling `--remote` (parsing
it out would be a little iffy) in a future PR.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Add a `CreateCommand` field to the pod config which includes the entire
`os.Args` at pod-creation. Similar to the already existing field in a
container config, we need this information to properly generate generic
systemd unit files for pods. It's a prerequisite to support the `--new`
flag for pods.
Also add the `CreateCommand` to the pod-inspect data, which can come in
handy for debugging, general inspection and certainly for the tests that
are added along with the other changes.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Enable pod inspect integration test
Get rid of libpod pod inspect references
Remove libpod PodInspect struct.
Signed-off-by: Sujil02 <sushah@redhat.com>
Rather than checking for non-zero, we need to check for >0 to
distinguish between timeouts and error exit codes.
Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image
stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time
significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from
a tarball anymore.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
a series of improvements to our ginkgo test framework so we can
get better ideas of whats going on when run in CI
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using
the remote client.
Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are
isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is
developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and
just block single tests as needed.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
A pause container is added to the pod if the user opts in. The default pause image and command can be overridden. Pause containers are ignored in ps unless the -a option is present. Pod inspect and pod ps show shared namespaces and pause container. A pause container can't be removed with podman rm, and a pod can be removed if it only has a pause container.
Signed-off-by: haircommander <pehunt@redhat.com>
Closes: #1187
Approved by: mheon
Valentin Rothberg
Ed Santiago
Jhon Honce
Paul Holzinger
zhangguanzhang
Daniel J Walsh
Matthew Heon
Matthew Heon
Brent Baude
Sujil02
Yiqiao Pu
haircommander