Moving from Go module v4 to v5 prepares us for public releases.
Move done using gomove [1] as with the v3 and v4 moves.
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
We had something like 6 different boolean options (removing a
container turns out to be rather complicated, because there are a
million-odd things that want to do it), and the function
signature was getting unreasonably large. Change to a struct to
clean things up.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
This allows for accurate reporting of dependency removal, but the
work is still incomplete: pods can be removed, but do not report
the containers they removed as part of said removal. Will add
this in a subsequent commit.
Major note: I made ignoring no-such-container errors automatic
once it has been determined that a container did exist in the
first place. I can't think of any case where this would not be a
TOCTOU - IE, no reason not to ignore them. The `--ignore` option
to `podman rm` should still retain meaning as it will ignore
errors from containers that didn't exist in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
This is the initial stage of implementation. The current API
functions but does not report the additional containers and pods
removed. This is necessary to properly display results to the
user after `podman rm --all`.
The existing remove-dependencies code has been removed in favor
of this more native solution.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
Originally, during pod removal, we locked every container in the
pod at once, did a number of validity checks to ensure everything
was safe, and then removed all the containers in the pod.
A deadlock was recently discovered with this approach. In brief,
we cannot lock the entire pod (or much more than a single
container at a time) without causing a deadlock. As such, we
converted to an approach where we just looped over each container
in the pod, removing them individually. Unfortunately, this
removed a lot of the validity checking of the earlier approach,
allowing for a lot of unintended bad things. Infra containers
could be removed while containers in the pod still depended on
them, for example.
There's no easy way to do validity checks while in a simple loop,
so I implemented a version of our graph-traversal logic that
currently handles pod start. This version acts in the reverse
order of startup: startup starts from containers which depend on
nothing and moves outwards, while removal acts on containers which
have nothing depend on them and moves inwards. By doing graph
traversal, we can guarantee that nothing is removed while
something that depends on it still exists - so the infra
container should be the last thing in a pod that is removed, for
example.
In the (unlikely) case that a graph of the pod's containers
cannot be built (most likely impossible without database editing)
the old method of pod removal has been retained to ensure that
even misbehaving pods can be forcibly evicted from the state.
I'm fairly confident that this resolves the problem, but there
are a lot of assumptions around dependency structure built into
the original pod removal code and I am not 100% sure I have
captured all of them.
Fixes#15526
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
Podman adds an Error: to every error message. So starting an error
message with "error" ends up being reported to the user as
Error: error ...
This patch removes the stutter.
Also ioutil.ReadFile errors report the Path, so wrapping the err message
with the path causes a stutter.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
We now use the golang error wrapping format specifier `%w` instead of
the deprecated github.com/pkg/errors package.
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
this is the first pass at implementing init containers for podman pods.
init containersare made popular by k8s as a way to run setup for pods
before the pods standard containers run.
unlike k8s, we support two styles of init containers: always and
oneshot. always means the container stays in the pod and starts
whenever a pod is started. this does not apply to pods restarting.
oneshot means the container runs onetime when the pod starts and then is
removed.
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
`gocritic` is a powerful linter that helps in preventing certain kinds
of errors as well as enforcing a coding style.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Support generating systemd unit files for a pod. Podman generates one
unit file for the pod including the PID file for the infra container's
conmon process and one unit file for each container (excluding the infra
container).
Note that this change implies refactorings in the `pkg/systemdgen` API.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
the compilation demands of having libpod in main is a burden for the
remote client compilations. to combat this, we should move the use of
libpod structs, vars, constants, and functions into the adapter code
where it will only be compiled by the local client.
this should result in cleaner code organization and smaller binaries. it
should also help if we ever need to compile the remote client on
non-Linux operating systems natively (not cross-compiled).
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Prior, a pod would have to be started immediately when created, leading to confusion about what a pod state should be immediately after creation. The problem was podman run --pod ... would error out if the infra container wasn't started (as it is a dependency). Fix this by allowing for recursive start, where each of the container's dependencies are started prior to the new container. This is only applied to the case where a new container is attached to a pod.
Also rework container_api Start, StartAndAttach, and Init functions, as there was some duplicated code, which made addressing the problem easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
Instead of looping to find containers with no dependencies,
maintain a map of them and remove entries as we add dependency
edges.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
Closes: #557
Approved by: rhatdan
Matt Heon
Oleksandr Redko
Paul Holzinger
Matthew Heon
Daniel J Walsh
Sascha Grunert
Valentin Rothberg
Brent Baude
Peter Hunt
Matthew Heon