e2e tests:
* remove two FIXMEs:
* one of them is expected behavior, not a FIXME
* the other is easily fixed
* File issue #12521 for a real podman-remote bug, and
update the Skip() message
system tests:
* in command-completion test, clean up stray podman-pause image
(followup to #12322, in which I missed this instance). This
removes distracting warnings from test logs.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Many ginkgo tests have been written to use this evil form:
GrepString("foo")
Expect(that to BeTrue())
...which yields horrible useless messages on failure:
false is not true
Identify those (automatically, via script) and convert to:
Expect(output to ContainSubstring("foo"))
...which yields:
"this output" does not contain substring "foo"
There are still many BeTrue()s left. This is just a start.
This is commit 1 of 2. It includes the script I used, and
all changes to *.go are those computed by the script.
Commit 2 will apply some manual fixes.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Found by my find-obsolete-skips script. Let's see which, if any,
of these skipped tests can be reenabled.
Some Skips are "this will never work", not "this is expected to
work one day". Update the message on those to reflect that.
Some were real bugs in the test framework. Fix those.
And, joy of joys, some work today. Remove those skips.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
e2e test failures are rife with messages like:
Expected 1 to equal 0
These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader
to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers
mean.
Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I
don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way
to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that
it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at
least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see
what the error message looks like.
THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human
to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random
ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is
a reproducer of what I did:
cd test/e2e
! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first,
! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because
! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero().
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go
! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes
! in run_exit_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)',
! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same.
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
! negative, old use of BeZero()
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch
point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out
copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you
have to review is that my replacements above are sane.
UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec
to the files that don't have it:
perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}'))
UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go
UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places
UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Add some more tests, document cases where remote will not work
Add FIXMEs for tests that should work on podman-remote but currently
do not.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
in an effort to speed up the remote testing, we should be using
lookaside storage to avoid pull images as well as importing multiple
images into the RW store.
one test was removed and added into system test by Ed in #8325
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Enables podman create, pull, run, import to use --signature-policy option. Set it as hidden flag to be consistent with other commands.
Signed-off-by: Qi Wang <qiwan@redhat.com>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
The way we were trying to parse was very broken. I originally
attempted to use Buildah's Dockerfile parser here, but dealing
with it (and convincing it to accept only a limited subset, and
only one instruction at a time) was challenging, so I rewrote a
subset of Dockerfile parsing. This should handle most common
cases well, though there are definitely unhandled edge cases for
ENV and LABEL.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image
stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time
significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from
a tarball anymore.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
a series of improvements to our ginkgo test framework so we can
get better ideas of whats going on when run in CI
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using
the remote client.
Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are
isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is
developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and
just block single tests as needed.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Because our tests are getting so long, we want to be able to audit which tests are taking
the longest to complete. This may indicate a bad test, bad CI, bad code, etc and therefore
should be auditable.
Also, make speed improvements to tests by making sure we only unpack caches images that
actually get used.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Closes: #1178
Approved by: mheon
Inspect should be able to inspect one or more containers depending
on the user input. Therefore, inspect output should be in array
format so the consumer could potentially iterate it. This PR allows
users to specify one more or containers|images|or a mix for
inspection. The output, as stated, is therefore in array form. This
holds true even for a singular image.
In the case that the user enters an invalid container|image "name", we
handle that gracefully. Podman will output json for the valid names
until it reaches the invalid one. For example:
In this case, podman will out the json for alpine and then print an
error about 123 being invalid. It will not continute onto busybox.
This behavior imatates docker.
This addresses issue #360
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Closes: #371
Approved by: baude
Changing these fields caused the output of podman inspect to more
closely match docker inspect.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Closes: #306
Approved by: mheon
If the output is to a terminal, return a new line at the end of the
output so that the output is visually appealing. If the output is being
piped, or saved to a file, basically not being outputted to a terminal, do
not print a new line at the end of the output. This ensures any further data
manipulation with the results happens smoothly without requiring to remember
the '/n' at the end of the output.
Signed-off-by: umohnani8 <umohnani@redhat.com>
Ed Santiago
Daniel J Walsh
Valentin Rothberg
baude
Qi Wang
Matthew Heon
Kunal Kushwaha
Yiqiao Pu
umohnani8