the podman artifact verb is used to manage OCI artifacts. the following
verbs were added to `podman artifact`:
* add
* inspect
* ls
* pull
* push
* rm
Notable items with this PR:
* all artifact commands and their output are subject to change. i.e.
consider all of this tech preview
* there is no way to add a file to an artifact that already exists in
the store. you would need to delete and recreate the artifact.
* all references to artifacts names should be fully qualified names in
the form of repo/name:tag (i.e. quay.io/artifact/foobar:latest)
* i understand that we will likely want to be able to attribute things
like arch, etc to artifact files. this function is not available yet.
Many thanks to Paul Holzinger for autocompletion PRs and review PRs that
fixed issues early on.
Also fix up some Args function to specify the correct number of args.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Move the options for the podman build doc to a common md
that can be used by both podman build and podman farm build.
Signed-off-by: Urvashi Mohnani <umohnani@redhat.com>
Previous tests have worked by pure chance since the client and server
ran on the same host; the server picked up the credentials created by
the client login.
Extend the gating tests and add a new integration test which is further
capable of exercising the remote code.
Note that fixing authentication support requires adding a new
`--authfile` CLi flag to `manifest inspect`. This will at least allow
for passing an authfile to be bindings. Username and password are not
yet supported.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@redhat.com>
In each options/foo.md, keep a list of where the option is used.
This will be valuable to anyone making future edits, and to
those reviewing those edits.
This may be a controversial commit, because those crossref lists
are autogenerated as a side effect of the script that reads them.
It definitely violates POLA. And one day, some kind person will
reconcile (e.g.) --label, using it in more man pages, and maybe
forget to git-commit the rewritten file, and CI will fail.
I think this is a tough tradeoff, but worth doing. Without this,
it's much too easy for someone to change an option file in a way
that renders it inapplicable/misleading for some podman commands.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Refactor the --authfile option.
My suggestion for review:
1) run hack/markdown-preprocess-review and immediately Ctrl-Q to
quit out of diffuse, which is completely unusable for this
many files; then
2) cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/authfile
- this is the directory created by the review script
3) rm podman-image-sign* podman-log* podman-search.1.md.in
- because they're essentially identical to podman-create
4) rm podman-manifest-* podman-push.*
- because they're 100% identical to podman-kube-play
5) rm podman-kube-play*
- because it's apart-from-whitespace identical to podman-build
(use "wdiff" to confirm)
6) rm podman-auto-update*
- because that's the one I chose (hence == zzz-chosen.md)
(You should obviously run your own diff/cmp before rm, to confirm
my assertions about which files are identical).
After all that, you have a manageable number of files which
you can scan, read, diff against zzz-chosen.md, even run diffuse.
This option is IMHO the poster child for why we need this kind
of man page refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Brent Baude
Urvashi Mohnani
Valentin Rothberg
Tom Deseyn
Daniel J Walsh
Ed Santiago