the previous implementation was expecting the rlimits to be set for the
entire process and clamping the values only when running as rootless.
Change the implementation to always specify the expected values in the
OCI spec file and do the clamping only when running as rootless and
using the default values.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Docker allows the passing of -1 to indicate the maximum limit
allowed for the current process.
Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/19319
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
QM needs to be able to specify the maximum number of open files within the QM
environment to ensure FFI.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
In each options/foo.md, keep a list of where the option is used.
This will be valuable to anyone making future edits, and to
those reviewing those edits.
This may be a controversial commit, because those crossref lists
are autogenerated as a side effect of the script that reads them.
It definitely violates POLA. And one day, some kind person will
reconcile (e.g.) --label, using it in more man pages, and maybe
forget to git-commit the rewritten file, and CI will fail.
I think this is a tough tradeoff, but worth doing. Without this,
it's much too easy for someone to change an option file in a way
that renders it inapplicable/misleading for some podman commands.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Followup to #15174. These are the options that are easy(ish)
to review: those that have only drifted slightly, and need
only minor tweaks to bring back to sanity. For the most part,
I went with the text in podman-run because that was cleaned up
in #5192 way back in 2020. These diffs primarily consist of
using '**' (star star) instead of backticks, plus other
formatting and punctuation changes.
This PR also adds a README in the options dir, and a new
convention: <<container text...|pod text...>> which tries
to do the right thing based on whether the man page name
includes "-pod-" or not. Since that's kind of hairy code,
I've also added a test suite for it.
Finally, since this is impossible to review by normal means,
I'm temporarily committing hack/markdown-preprocess-review,
a script that will diff option-by-option. I will remove it
once we finish this cleanup, but be advised that there are
still 130+ options left to examine, and some of those are
going to be really hard to reunite.
Review script usage: simply run it (you need to have 'diffuse'
installed). It isn't exactly obvious, but it shouldn't take more
than a minute to figure out. The rightmost column (zzz-chosen.md)
is the "winner", the actual content that will be used henceforth.
You really want an ultrawide screen here.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Giuseppe Scrivano
Daniel J Walsh
Ed Santiago