We are missing the equivalence of the docker system commands
This patch set adds `podman system prune`
and `podman system info`
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
addition of import and export for the podman-remote client. This includes
the ability to send and receive files between the remote-client and the
"podman" host using an upgraded varlink connection.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
The toolbox project would benefit from a few changes to more closely
resembe the original atomic cli project. Changes made are:
* only pull image for container runlabel if the label exists in the image
* if a container image does not have the desired label, exit with non-zero
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
we now, by default, only prune dangling images. if --all is passed, we
prune dangling images AND images that do not have an associated containers.
also went ahead and enabled the podman-remote image prune side of things.
Fixes: #2192
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
We clean up the code by eliminating stuttering references when we embed
the runtime struct into localRuntime. Makes for less change in the future
as well.
++ jhonce
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using
the remote client.
Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are
isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is
developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and
just block single tests as needed.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
- It is used to fill Repository(misnamed)/Tag members which have no users;
so it's completely unclear why this is useful.
- Given the mishandling of tags by imageParts.tag, at the very least
all new code should primarily use reference.Named (even if
after a decompose() to internally deal with unqualified names first),
introducing new uses of original decompose() just reintroduces known
trouble - so without any provided rationale, reverting seems
a reasonable default action.
- This drags in all of libpod/image into the "remote client" build,
which seems undesirable.
Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <mitr@redhat.com>
Add the ability to build a remote client in golang that uses all
the same front-end cli code and output code. The initial limitations
here are that it can only be a local client while the bridge and
resolver code is being written for the golang varlink client.
Tests and docs will be added in subsequent PRs.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Daniel J Walsh
baude
Miloslav Trmač