podman/pkg/machine/ocipull
Brent Baude d7bc7b7b41 do not require policy.json
we are having second thoughts about *requiring* a policy.json on podman
machine hosts.  we are concerned that we need to work out some more use
cases to be sure we do not make choices now that limit us in the near
term future. for example, should the policy files be the same for
container images and machine images? And should one live on the host
machine and the other live in the machine?

therefore, if a policy.json *is* present in the correct location, we will use and honor it; however, if it does not, we will allow the machine image to be pulled without a policy.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <baude@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Holzinger <45212748+Luap99@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
2024-03-13 09:07:51 -05:00
..
oci.go Allow podman machine to download from oci registry 2024-02-12 15:19:34 -06:00
ociartifact.go Add final machine endpoint 2024-03-12 09:37:57 -05:00
ociartifact_test.go Allow podman machine to download from oci registry 2024-02-12 15:19:34 -06:00
ocidir.go Bump Go module to v5 2024-02-08 09:35:39 -05:00
policy.go do not require policy.json 2024-03-13 09:07:51 -05:00
policy.json pkg/machine/ocipull: add default policy.json file 2024-02-27 15:29:59 +01:00
policy_unix.go pkg/machine/ocipull: add custom policy.json location 2024-02-27 15:29:58 +01:00
policy_windows.go pkg/machine/ocipull: add custom policy.json location 2024-02-27 15:29:58 +01:00
pull.go do not require policy.json 2024-03-13 09:07:51 -05:00
source.go Fix small bug in ocipull 2024-02-14 12:37:18 -06:00