dapr
/
community
mirror of https://github.com/dapr/community.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

review comments

This commit is contained in:
rabollin 2024-01-25 21:08:45 +05:30
parent a28131ef1d
commit e7e9a5af5b
1 changed files with 21 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
community-membership.md
View File

@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ The following apply to the subproject for which one would be an owner:
New Core-maintainers can be added to the project by a super-majority (two-thirds / 66.66%) vote. Only the Core-maintainers of the repository in which the nomination is applied to have a binding vote, while Core-maintainers from other repositories are on an informed basis via a separate email thread. A potential Core-maintainer may be nominated by an existing Core-maintainer from the repository in which the nomination is applied to. A vote is conducted in private between the current Core-maintainers over the course of a one week voting period. At the end of the week, votes are counted and a pull request is made on the repo adding the new core-maintainer to the CODEOWNERS file. New Core-maintainers can be added to the project by a super-majority (two-thirds / 66.66%) vote. Only the Core-maintainers of the repository in which the nomination is applied to have a binding vote, while Core-maintainers from other repositories are on an informed basis via a separate email thread. A potential Core-maintainer may be nominated by an existing Core-maintainer from the repository in which the nomination is applied to. A vote is conducted in private between the current Core-maintainers over the course of a one week voting period. At the end of the week, votes are counted and a pull request is made on the repo adding the new core-maintainer to the CODEOWNERS file.
Core-maintainers for new repositories can be nominated by any member of the steering committee and voted on in a steering committee meeting. Core-Maintainers for new repositories can be nominated by any member of the steering committee and voted on in a steering committee meeting.
Single Core-maintainers of a repository can nominate a new Core-maintainer and *MUST* inform the steering committee of their intention. The Core-maintainer can be approved if no objections have been raised in a period of one week. Single Core-Maintainers of a repository can nominate a new Core-Maintainer and *MUST* inform the steering committee of their intention. The Core-Maintainer can be approved if no objections have been raised in a period of one week.
A Core-maintainer may step down by submitting an issue stating their intent. A Core-Maintainer may step down by submitting an issue stating their intent.
### Responsibilities and privileges ### Responsibilities and privileges
@ -169,10 +169,10 @@ files.
### Requirements ### Requirements
The following apply to the sub area(ex: building block API/ Control plane service/ Component provider) for which one would be a Feature-maintainer: The following apply to the area(ex: building block API/ Control plane service/ Component provider) for which one would be a Feature-maintainer:
- Deep understanding of the technical goals and direction of the sub area. - Deep understanding of the technical goals and direction of the area.
- Deep understanding of the technical domain (specifically the language) of the sub area - Deep understanding of the technical domain (specifically the language) of the area
- Sustained contributions to design and direction by doing all of: - Sustained contributions to design and direction by doing all of:
- Authoring and reviewing proposals - Authoring and reviewing proposals
- Initiating, contributing and resolving discussions For example Discord discussions, GitHub issues, meetings) - Initiating, contributing and resolving discussions For example Discord discussions, GitHub issues, meetings)
@ -184,43 +184,37 @@ The following apply to the sub area(ex: building block API/ Control plane servic
### Acceptance ### Acceptance
New Feature-Maintainers can be added to the project by a super-majority (two-thirds / 66.66%) vote. Only the maintainers of the repository in which the nomination is applied have a binding vote, while maintainers from other repositories are on an informed basis via a separate email thread. New Feature-Maintainers can be added to the project by a super-majority (two-thirds / 66.66%) vote. Only the Core-maintainers of the repository in which the nomination is applied have a binding vote, while maintainers from other repositories are on an informed basis via a separate email thread.
A potential feature-maintainer may be nominated by an existing maintainer from the repository in which the nomination is applied to. A vote is conducted in private between the current maintainers over the course of a one week voting period. At the end of the week, votes are counted, and a pull request is made on the repo adding the new feature-maintainer to the feature-maintainers.md file. A potential feature-maintainer may be nominated by an existing Core-Maintainer from the repository in which the nomination is applied to. A vote is conducted in private between the current maintainers over the course of a one week voting period. At the end of the week, votes are counted, and a pull request is made on the repo adding the new feature-maintainer to the feature-maintainers.md file.
Feature-maintainers MUST remain active. If they are unresponsive for >3 months, they will be automatically removed unless a super-majority of the other repository maintainers agrees to extend the period to be greater than 3 months. Feature-Maintainers MUST remain active. If they are unresponsive for >3 months, they will be automatically removed unless a super-majority of the other repository maintainers agrees to extend the period to be greater than 3 months.
A feature-maintainer may step down by submitting an issue stating their intent. A feature-maintainer may step down by submitting an issue stating their intent.
### Example of Feature Maintainers in DAPR Runtime repo: ### Example of Feature Maintainers in DAPR Runtime repo:
Sub Area
Person Name
Workflow
Chris Gillum
Control Plane Service(mTLS)
Josh V
| **Subarea** | **Name** | | **Subarea** | **Name** |**GH Handle**|
| ---------- | ---------------------------------------------| | ---------- | ---------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Workflow | Chris Gilum | | Workflow | Chris Gilum |cgillum |
| Control Plane Service(mTLS)| Josh V | | Control Plane Service(mTLS)| Josh V |JoshVanL |
### Responsibilities and privileges ### Responsibilities and privileges
The following applies to the sub area(ex: building block API/ Control plane service/ Component provider) for which the feature-maintainer would be an owner: The following applies to the area(ex: building block API/ Control plane service/ Component provider) for which the feature-maintainer would be an owner:
- Make and approve technical design decisions for the sub area - Make and approve technical design decisions for the area
- Set technical direction and priorities for the sub area. - Set technical direction and priorities for the area.
- Define milestones and releases working along with the maintainers - Define milestones and releases working along with the maintainers
- Decides on when PRs are merged to control the release scope - Decides on when PRs are merged to control the release scope
- Mentor and guide approvers and contributors of the sub area - Mentor and guide approvers and contributors of the area
- Escalate approver and maintainer workflow concerns. (For example responsiveness, availability, and general contributor community health) to the STC - Escalate approver and maintainer workflow concerns. (For example responsiveness, availability, and general contributor community health) to the STC
- Ensure continued health of sub area: - Ensure continued health of area:
- Adequate test coverage to confidently release - Adequate test coverage to confidently release
- Tests are passing reliably (not flaky) and are fixed when they fail. - Tests are passing reliably (not flaky) and are fixed when they fail.
- Work with other feature-maintainers & Core-maintainers to maintain the project's overall health and success holistically. - Work with other feature-maintainers & Core-maintainers to maintain the project's overall health and success holistically.
- Membership tracked in feature-maintainer.md entry and scoped to a sub area. - Membership tracked in feature-maintainer.md entry and scoped to a area.
- MUST maintain components, review, and approve proposals for enhancing areas falling under the user sub area. - Must maintain components, review, and approve proposals for enhancing areas falling under the user area.
- Actively participate in issue triages and PR reviews - Actively participate in issue triages and PR reviews
- Set milestone priorities for the sub areas or delegate the responsibility to repo maintainers. - Set milestone priorities for the areas working with the repo maintainers.
- Ensure a healthy process for discussion and decision making is in place - Ensure a healthy process for discussion and decision making is in place