From 56a68def7fdd425cb56dd248bfd36cefe07f3b4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shriroop Joshi Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:14:59 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update service-mesh.md (#2044) Minor typo Co-authored-by: greenie-msft <56556602+greenie-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Fussell --- daprdocs/content/en/concepts/service-mesh.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daprdocs/content/en/concepts/service-mesh.md b/daprdocs/content/en/concepts/service-mesh.md index 1c81221f7..96613a319 100644 --- a/daprdocs/content/en/concepts/service-mesh.md +++ b/daprdocs/content/en/concepts/service-mesh.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: > How Dapr compares to and works with service meshes --- -Dapr uses a sidecar architecture, running as a separate process alongside the application and includes features such as service invocation, network security, and distributed tracing. This often raises the question: how does Dapr compare to service mesh solutions such as [Linkerd](https://linkerd.io/), [Istio](https://istio.io/) and [Open Service Mesh](https://openservicemesh.io/) amoung others? +Dapr uses a sidecar architecture, running as a separate process alongside the application and includes features such as service invocation, network security, and distributed tracing. This often raises the question: how does Dapr compare to service mesh solutions such as [Linkerd](https://linkerd.io/), [Istio](https://istio.io/) and [Open Service Mesh](https://openservicemesh.io/) among others? ## How Dapr and service meshes compare While Dapr and service meshes do offer some overlapping capabilities, **Dapr is not a service mesh**, where a service mesh is defined as a *networking* service mesh. Unlike a service mesh which is focused on networking concerns, Dapr is focused on providing building blocks that make it easier for developers to build applications as microservices. Dapr is developer-centric, versus service meshes which are infrastructure-centric.