Fix `KeyError` when creating a new secret

How to reproduce the issue:

```py
>>> import docker
>>> cli = docker.from_env()
>>> cli.secrets.create(name="any_name", data="1")
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/docker-py/docker/models/secrets.py", line 10, in __repr__
    return "<%s: '%s'>" % (self.__class__.__name__, self.name)
  File "/home/docker-py/docker/models/secrets.py", line 14, in name
    return self.attrs['Spec']['Name']
KeyError: 'Spec'
```

The exception raises because create secrets API `/secrets/create` only
return the `id` attribute:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/api/v1.41/#operation/SecretCreate
The secret model is created using just the `id` attribute and fails
when looking for Spec.Name attribute.

```py
def __repr__(self):
    return "<%s: '%s'>" % (self.__class__.__name__, self.name)
```

```py
@property
def name(self):
    return self.attrs['Spec']['Name']
```

I came up with a ugly solution but will prevent the problem to happen
again:

```py
def create(self, **kwargs):
    obj = self.client.api.create_secret(**kwargs)
+   obj.setdefault("Spec", {})["Name"] = kwargs.get("name")
    return self.prepare_model(obj)
```

After the API call, I added the name attribute to the right place to be
used on the property name.

```py
>>> import docker
>>> cli = docker.from_env()
>>> cli.secrets.create(name="any_name", data="1")
<Secret: 'any_name'>
```

It isn't the most elegant solution, but it will do the trick.
I had a previous PR #2517 when I propose using the `id` attribute
instead of `name` on the `__repr__` method, but I think this one will be better.

That fixes #2025

Signed-off-by: Felipe Ruhland <felipe.ruhland@gmail.com>

docker/models/secrets.py

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ class SecretCollection(Collection):
 
     def create(self, **kwargs):
         obj = self.client.api.create_secret(**kwargs)
+        obj.setdefault("Spec", {})["Name"] = kwargs.get("name")
         return self.prepare_model(obj)
     create.__doc__ = APIClient.create_secret.__doc__
 

tests/unit/fake_api.py

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ FAKE_URL = 'myurl'
 FAKE_PATH = '/path'
 FAKE_VOLUME_NAME = 'perfectcherryblossom'
 FAKE_NODE_ID = '24ifsmvkjbyhk'
+FAKE_SECRET_ID = 'epdyrw4tsi03xy3deu8g8ly6o'
+FAKE_SECRET_NAME = 'super_secret'
 
 # Each method is prefixed with HTTP method (get, post...)
 # for clarity and readability
@@ -512,6 +514,12 @@ def post_fake_network_disconnect():
     return 200, None
 
 
+def post_fake_secret():
+    status_code = 200
+    response = {'ID': FAKE_SECRET_ID}
+    return status_code, response
+
+
 # Maps real api url to fake response callback
 prefix = 'http+docker://localhost'
 if constants.IS_WINDOWS_PLATFORM:
@@ -643,4 +651,6 @@ fake_responses = {
         CURRENT_VERSION, prefix, FAKE_NETWORK_ID
     ), 'POST'):
     post_fake_network_disconnect,
+    '{1}/{0}/secrets/create'.format(CURRENT_VERSION, prefix):
+    post_fake_secret,
 }

tests/unit/fake_api_client.py

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ def make_fake_api_client(overrides=None):
             fake_api.post_fake_create_container()[1],
         'create_host_config.side_effect': api_client.create_host_config,
         'create_network.return_value': fake_api.post_fake_network()[1],
+        'create_secret.return_value': fake_api.post_fake_secret()[1],
         'exec_create.return_value': fake_api.post_fake_exec_create()[1],
         'exec_start.return_value': fake_api.post_fake_exec_start()[1],
         'images.return_value': fake_api.get_fake_images()[1],

tests/unit/models_secrets_test.py

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+import unittest
+
+from .fake_api_client import make_fake_client
+from .fake_api import FAKE_SECRET_NAME
+
+
+class CreateServiceTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_secrets_repr(self):
+        client = make_fake_client()
+        secret = client.secrets.create(name="super_secret", data="secret")
+        assert secret.__repr__() == "<Secret: '{}'>".format(FAKE_SECRET_NAME)