mirror of https://github.com/docker/docs.git
engine: remove devicemapper from storage-driver selection page
The devicemapper storage-driver has been removed in Docker Engine v25; mark the driver as removed, and remove mentions of it in the storage driver selection page. The devicemapper storage driver page itself is kept for now, to make the deprecation banner on that page more discoverable, and because some packagers still provide Docker Engine 23.0 as an LTS version, so users may migrate from 23.0 to newer versions. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
This commit is contained in:
parent
672ff038b8
commit
99aae24a1d
|
@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ $ sudo btrfs filesystem balance /var/lib/docker
|
|||
|
||||
## How the `btrfs` storage driver works
|
||||
|
||||
The `btrfs` storage driver works differently from `devicemapper` or other
|
||||
The `btrfs` storage driver works differently from other
|
||||
storage drivers in that your entire `/var/lib/docker/` directory is stored on a
|
||||
Btrfs volume.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ aliases:
|
|||
> **Deprecated**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The Device Mapper driver [has been deprecated](../../../engine/deprecated.md#device-mapper-storage-driver),
|
||||
> and will be removed in Docker Engine v25.0. If you are using Device Mapper,
|
||||
> and is removed in Docker Engine v25.0. If you are using Device Mapper,
|
||||
> you must migrate to a supported storage driver before upgrading to Docker
|
||||
> Engine v25.0. Read the [Docker storage drivers](select-storage-driver.md)
|
||||
> page for supported storage drivers.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Docker storage drivers
|
||||
description: Learn how to select the proper storage driver for your container.
|
||||
keywords: container, storage, driver, btrfs, devicemapper, zfs, overlay, overlay2
|
||||
keywords: container, storage, driver, btrfs, zfs, overlay, overlay2
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- /engine/userguide/storagedriver/
|
||||
- /engine/userguide/storagedriver/selectadriver/
|
||||
|
@ -21,13 +21,12 @@ driver with the best overall performance and stability in the most usual scenari
|
|||
|
||||
The Docker Engine provides the following storage drivers on Linux:
|
||||
|
||||
| Driver | Description |
|
||||
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `overlay2` | `overlay2` is the preferred storage driver for all currently supported Linux distributions, and requires no extra configuration. |
|
||||
| `fuse-overlayfs` | `fuse-overlayfs`is preferred only for running Rootless Docker on a host that does not provide support for rootless `overlay2`. On Ubuntu and Debian 10, the `fuse-overlayfs` driver does not need to be used, and `overlay2` works even in rootless mode. Refer to the [rootless mode documentation](../../engine/security/rootless.md) for details. |
|
||||
| `btrfs` and `zfs` | The `btrfs` and `zfs` storage drivers allow for advanced options, such as creating "snapshots", but require more maintenance and setup. Each of these relies on the backing filesystem being configured correctly. |
|
||||
| `vfs` | The `vfs` storage driver is intended for testing purposes, and for situations where no copy-on-write filesystem can be used. Performance of this storage driver is poor, and is not generally recommended for production use. |
|
||||
| `devicemapper` ([deprecated](../../../engine/deprecated.md#device-mapper-storage-driver)) | The `devicemapper` storage driver requires `direct-lvm` for production environments, because `loopback-lvm`, while zero-configuration, has very poor performance. `devicemapper` was the recommended storage driver for CentOS and RHEL, as their kernel version did not support `overlay2`. However, current versions of CentOS and RHEL now have support for `overlay2`, which is now the recommended driver. |
|
||||
| Driver | Description |
|
||||
| :---------------- | :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `overlay2` | `overlay2` is the preferred storage driver for all currently supported Linux distributions, and requires no extra configuration. |
|
||||
| `fuse-overlayfs` | `fuse-overlayfs`is preferred only for running Rootless Docker on a host that does not provide support for rootless `overlay2`. On Ubuntu and Debian 10, the `fuse-overlayfs` driver does not need to be used, and `overlay2` works even in rootless mode. Refer to the [rootless mode documentation](../../engine/security/rootless.md) for details. |
|
||||
| `btrfs` and `zfs` | The `btrfs` and `zfs` storage drivers allow for advanced options, such as creating "snapshots", but require more maintenance and setup. Each of these relies on the backing filesystem being configured correctly. |
|
||||
| `vfs` | The `vfs` storage driver is intended for testing purposes, and for situations where no copy-on-write filesystem can be used. Performance of this storage driver is poor, and is not generally recommended for production use. |
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- markdownlint-disable reference-links-images -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -64,18 +63,14 @@ example, `btrfs` is only supported if your system uses `btrfs` as storage. In
|
|||
general, the following configurations work on recent versions of the Linux
|
||||
distribution:
|
||||
|
||||
| Linux distribution | Recommended storage drivers | Alternative drivers |
|
||||
| :----------------- | :-------------------------- | :---------------------------- |
|
||||
| Ubuntu | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| Debian | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `vfs` |
|
||||
| CentOS | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| Fedora | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| SLES 15 | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `vfs` |
|
||||
| RHEL | `overlay2` | `devicemapper`¹, `vfs` |
|
||||
|
||||
¹) The `devicemapper` storage driver is deprecated, and will be removed in a future
|
||||
release. It is recommended that users of the `devicemapper` storage driver migrate
|
||||
to `overlay2`.
|
||||
| Linux distribution | Recommended storage drivers | Alternative drivers |
|
||||
| :------------------- | :--------------------------- | :------------------- |
|
||||
| Ubuntu | `overlay2` | `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| Debian | `overlay2` | `vfs` |
|
||||
| CentOS | `overlay2` | `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| Fedora | `overlay2` | `zfs`, `vfs` |
|
||||
| SLES 15 | `overlay2` | `vfs` |
|
||||
| RHEL | `overlay2` | `vfs` |
|
||||
|
||||
When in doubt, the best all-around configuration is to use a modern Linux
|
||||
distribution with a kernel that supports the `overlay2` storage driver, and to
|
||||
|
@ -111,7 +106,6 @@ backing filesystems.
|
|||
| :--------------- | :---------------------------- |
|
||||
| `overlay2` | `xfs` with ftype=1, `ext4` |
|
||||
| `fuse-overlayfs` | any filesystem |
|
||||
| `devicemapper` | `direct-lvm` |
|
||||
| `btrfs` | `btrfs` |
|
||||
| `zfs` | `zfs` |
|
||||
| `vfs` | any filesystem |
|
||||
|
@ -127,7 +121,7 @@ following generalizations:
|
|||
- `overlay2` operates at the file level rather than
|
||||
the block level. This uses memory more efficiently, but the container's
|
||||
writable layer may grow quite large in write-heavy workloads.
|
||||
- Block-level storage drivers such as `devicemapper`, `btrfs`, and `zfs` perform
|
||||
- Block-level storage drivers such as `btrfs`, and `zfs` perform
|
||||
better for write-heavy workloads (though not as well as Docker volumes).
|
||||
- `btrfs` and `zfs` require a lot of memory.
|
||||
- `zfs` is a good choice for high-density workloads such as PaaS.
|
||||
|
@ -197,7 +191,6 @@ to physical or logical disks on the Docker host.
|
|||
## Related information
|
||||
|
||||
- [About images, containers, and storage drivers](index.md)
|
||||
- [`devicemapper` storage driver in practice](device-mapper-driver.md)
|
||||
- [`overlay2` storage driver in practice](overlayfs-driver.md)
|
||||
- [`btrfs` storage driver in practice](btrfs-driver.md)
|
||||
- [`zfs` storage driver in practice](zfs-driver.md)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue