I also needed to add a mflag.IsSet() function that allows you to check
to see if a certain flag was actually specified on the cmd line.
Per #9221 - also tweaked the docs to fix a typo.
Closes#9221
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
still supports the old form: ENV name value
Also, fixed an issue with the parser where it would ignore lines
at the end of the Dockerfile that ended with \
Closes#2333
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Now filter name is trimmed and lowercased before evaluation for case
insensitive and whitespace trimemd check.
Signed-off-by: Oh Jinkyun <tintypemolly@gmail.com>
This adds an integration test for checking that the network namespace
fds are the same when a container joins another container's network
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Common patterns:
- Multiple images were built with same name but only one cleanup.
- Containers were deleted after images.
- Images not removed after retagging.
Signed-off-by: Tõnis Tiigi <tonistiigi@gmail.com> (github: tonistiigi)
Next steps, in another PR, would be:
- make all logging go through the logrus stuff
- I'd like to see if we can remove the env var stuff (like DEBUG) but we'll see
Closes#5198
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Therer is a bug in the 'skip' decision when exporting a repository
(`docker save repo`)
Only the layers of the first image are included in the archive (the
layers of the next images are missing)
Signed-off-by: Anthony Baire <Anthony.Baire@irisa.fr>
Some workloads rely on IPC for communications with other processes. We
would like to split workloads between two container but still allow them
to communicate though shared IPC.
This patch mimics the --net code to allow --ipc=host to not split off
the IPC Namespace. ipc=container:CONTAINERID to share ipc between containers
If you share IPC between containers, then you need to make sure SELinux labels
match.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> (github: rhatdan)
I noticed a few things that were bugging me in the output
of the integration-cli tests.
- one of the tests used println to stdout so we had garage sent to the screen
- some of the test, in their final log message, didn't include the name of
the group/file e.g. daemon - run,iptables was just run,iptables
And yes, I noticed this because I'm anal :-) but also because we should keep
the output of the tests as clean as possible so its easy to spot it when
things go bad.
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Running parseVolumesFromSpec on all VolumesFrom specs before initialize
any mounts endures that we don't leave container.Volumes in an
inconsistent (partially initialized) if one of out mount groups is not
available (e.g. the container we're trying to mount from does not
exist).
Keeping container.Volumes in a consistent state ensures that next time
we Start() the container, it'll run prepareVolumes() again.
The attached test demonstrates that when a container fails to start due
to a missing container specified in VolumesFrom, it "remembers" a Volume
that worked.
Fixes: #8726
Signed-off-by: Thomas Orozco <thomas@orozco.fr>
Jessica Frazelle
Jessie Frazelle
Doug Davis
Erik Hollensbe
Victor Vieux
Daehyeok Mun
Vincent Batts
Alexander Morozov
Michael Crosby
Daniel, Dao Quang Minh
unclejack
Oh Jinkyun
Michael Crosby
Tonis Tiigi
Marianna
Srini Brahmaroutu
Anthony Baire
Dan Walsh
Tibor Vass
Thomas Orozco
Alexandr Morozov