Given:
- None of the methods of the `Storage` are mutating the storage
itself.
- It must be instantiated to be usable, as there is a strict
reliance on values.
- The struct itself is light.
This seems to be more fitting.
Signed-off-by: Hidde Beydals <hidde@hhh.computer>
This commits adds verification of the digest of the artifact in storage
to all reconcilers which manage artifacts.
When the artifact does not have a digest or if it mismatches with the
file in storage, the file is removed from the storage and status of the
object.
This hardens the storage against potential tampering, in addition to
resolving an issue where users upgrading from a (much) older version of
the controller would run into an error after the checksum field was
removed from the API.
This would cause the controller to not advertise any checksum at all,
while not producing a new one until a new revision was detected.
Resulting in fetch failures for consumers while they would try to
verify the digest of the advertised artifact.
While not strictly part of this exercise, some of the tests were
altered to prepare the storage used in test cases to become isolated
by strictly using the `storage` provided via the callback. Actually
isolating this has however been left as a task at a later moment.
Signed-off-by: Hidde Beydals <hidde@hhh.computer>
Hidde Beydals
Sunny