- Add `@Internal` and `@ExperimentalApi`, both are annotated `@Internal`
- Annotate `@Internal` to `package io.grpc.internal`
- AbstractChannelBuilder.ChannelEssentials is annotated `@Internal`
- ChannelImpl.ping() is annotated `@ExperimentalApi`
- Context is annotated `@ExperimentalApi`
- Add `package-info.java` to `io.grpc.inprocess` and `io.grpc.internal`.
Reserve io.grpc for public API only, and all internal stuff in core to
io.grpc.internal, including the non-stable transport API.
Raise the netty/okhttp/inprocess subpackages one level up to io.grpc,
because they are public API and entry points for most users.
Details:
- Rename io.grpc.transport to io.grpc.internal;
- Move SharedResourceHolder and SerializingExecutor to io.grpc.internal
- Rename io.grpc.transport.{netty|okhttp|inprocess} to
io.grpc.{netty|okhttp|inprocess}
ChannelInactive should be called in all cases of channel going down, so
we only need to cancel ping there. Use goAwayStatus for the error, since
we will be putting the most effort into making that status useful.
When connectionError was set, goAwayStatus was also set, so we shouldn't
lose any errors.
NettyClientTransport doesn't really need a Throwable, it just needs a
Status. Passing a Status out of NettyClientHandler reduces the number of
places that need to do transport-specific translation of Throwables into
Status codes.
As described in SslHandler's documentation, handshakeFuture() and
SslHandshakeCompletionEvent are equivalent forms of learning of
handshake completion. Watching both causes double-logging and serves no
purpose.
Otherwise new writes will be written to the channel and will fail in
some unhelpful way.
Logging was removed as we really want to propagate the failure back to
the application via Calls, which is done by failing the
CreateStreamCommand message. Propagating back to the application via
call removes uncontrollable log spam and is necessary anyway to inform
the application what sort of failure occurred in order to appropriately
to react.
Holding the lock while calling the transport can cause a deadlock, as
shown in #696. In previous auditing for deadlock prevention I considered
heavily Call interactions, but failed to consider shutdown() and realize
it was holding a lock while calling transport.shutdown().
We still hold a lock when calling transport.start(). Although it is
conceivable that this could cause a deadlock as the code evolves over
time, I don't believe it can cause a deadlock today or that the risk is
very high. In addition, it would require more effort to solve.
Xudong Ma
Carl Mastrangelo
Kun Zhang
Eric Anderson
Jack Coughlin
mekka