Previous versions of error prone were incompatible with Java 17 javac.
In grpc-api, errorprone is now api dependency because it is on a public
API. I was happy to see that Gradle failed the build without the dep
change, although the error message wasn't super clear as to the cause.
It seems that previously -PerrorProne=false did nothing. I'm guessing
this is due to a behavior change of Gradle at some point. Swapping to
using the project does build without errorProne, although the build
fails with Javac complaining certain classes are unavailable. It's
unclear why. It doesn't seem to be caused by the error-prone plugin.
I've left it failing as a pre-existing issue.
ClientCalls/ServerCalls had Deprecated removed from some methods because
they were only deprecated in the internal class, not the API. And with
Deprecated, InlineMeSuggester complained.
I'm finding InlineMeSuggester to be overzealous, complaining about
package-private methods. In time we may figure out how to use it better,
or we may request changes to the checker in error-prone.
These changes make the build compatible with Gradle 7, except for
Android which requires plugin updates.
I removed animalsniffer from binder because it did nothing (as there
were no signatures) and it was failing after setting toolVersion. It
failed because animalsniffer is only compatible with java plugin. After
this change I put the withId(animalsniffer) loading inside the
withId(java) to avoid a plugin ordering failure. That made it safe again
for binder to load animalsniffer, but it is still best to remove the
plugin from binder as it is misleading.
I did not upgrade Android plugin versions as newer versions (even 3.6)
require dealing with androidx (#8421).
failOnVersionConflict has never been good for us. It is equivalent to
Maven dependencyConvergence which we discourage our users to use because
it is too tempermental and _creates_ version skew issues over time.
However, we had no real alternative for determining if our deps would be
misinterpeted by Maven.
failOnVersionConflict has been a constant drain and makes it really hard
to do seemingly-trivial upgrades. As evidenced by protobuf/build.gradle
in this change, it also caused _us_ to introduce a version downgrade.
This introduces our own custom requireUpperBoundDeps implementation so
that we can get back to simple dependency upgrades _and_ increase our
confidence in a consistent dependency tree.
- Use gradle configuration `api` for dependencies that are part of grpc public api signatures.
- Replace deprecated gradle configurations `compile`, `testCompile`, `runtime` and `testRuntime`.
- With minimal change in dependencies: If we need dep X and Y to compile our code, and if X transitively depends on Y, then our build would still pass even if we only include X as `compile`/`implementation` dependency for our project. Ideally we should include both X and Y explicitly as `implementation` dependency for our project, but in this PR we don't add the missing Y if it is previously missing.
Define util function to exclude guava's transitive dependencies jsr305 and animal-sniffer-annotations, and always manually add them as runtimeOnly dependency. error_prone_annotations is an exception: It is also excluded but manually added not as runtimeOnly. It must always compile with guava, otherwise users will see warning spams if guava is in the compile classpath but error_prone_annotations is not.
io.grpc has fewer dependencies than io.grpc.internal. Moving it to a
separate artifact lets users use the API without bringing in the deps.
If the library has an optional dependency on grpc, that can be quite
convenient.
We now version-pin both grpc-api and grpc-core, since both contain
internal APIs.
I had to change a few tests in grpc-api to avoid FakeClock. Moving
FakeClock to grpc-api was difficult because it uses
io.grpc.internal.TimeProvider, which can't be moved since it is a
production class. Having grpc-api's tests depend on grpc-core's test
classes would be weird and cause a circular dependincy. Having
grpc-api's tests depend on grpc-core is likely possible, but weird and
fairly unnecessary at this point. So instead I rewrote the tests to
avoid FakeClock.
Fixes#1447