This PR adds an automatic gradle format checker and reformats all the *.gradle files. After this, new changes to *.gradle files will fail to build if not in good format, just like checkStyle failure.
gRPC's protobuf-lite auto-selects between full and lite protobuf based on the
value of crosstool_top. If the user is specifying their own
--android_crosstool_top, then it will not auto-detect correctly. One day,
platforms will fix problems like this, but for the moment it seems we get to
live with it.
This was deprecated with Bazel 0.8.0, which now uses
@com_google_protobuf instead.
This change will break users that use
grpc_java_repositories(omit_com_google_protobuf_java=True), so I've
added a custom error message to make the resolution clearer.
This commit aligns the naming of the Bazel Maven jars with the names
used by Bazel's migration-tooling project:
https://github.com/bazelbuild/migration-tooling
Unfortunately, we can't fix @com_google_protobuf_java because it's
required by Bazel itself.
Fixes#3328
Bazel third party dependencies are specified in repositories.bzl which
gives the consumer the ability to opt-out of any dependencies they use
directly in their own project.
Fixes#2756
The new plugin uses a newer version of animalsniffer, allows overriding
the animalsniffer version used, and has up-to-date handling. The
up-to-date handling cuts fully incremental parallel build times in half,
from 5.5s to 2.7s.
The previous plugin was supposed to be verifying tests. However, either
it wasn't verifying them or its verification was broken.
core: adds @Nullable Object getAttachedObject() to ServiceDescriptor
compiler: Plumbing necessary to access proto file descriptors via
the reflection service
Protobuf-lite since beta-4 is now more of a fork than a subset of
protobuf-java, which may cause us problems later since lite API is not
stable. Also, lite-generated code may now depend on APIs only in
protobuf-lite, so our users must depend on the protobuf-lite runtime.
Having all our users explicitly override the dependency is bothersome to
them and can easily only expose problems only after we do a release.
So now we are doing the dependency overriding; most users should "just
work" and pick up the correct protobuf artifact. I've confirmed the
exclusion is listed in the grpc-protobuf pom and "gradle dependencies"
and "mvn dependency:tree" do not include protobuf-lite for the examples.
Vanilla protobuf users are most likely to experience any breakage, which
should detect problems more quickly since we use protobuf-java more
frequently than protobuf-lite during development.
protobuf-lite does not include pre-generated code for the well-known
protos, so users will need to generate them themselves for the moment
(google/protobuf#1889).
Note that today changing deps does not noticeably reduce the method code
for our users, since ProGuard already is stripping most classes. The
difference in output is only a reduction of 3 classes and 6 methods for
the android example.
Lite already worked by using the protobuf project, but would bring in
extra dependencies that are not intended to work with lite. Although
protobuf is not yet providing a lite package on Maven Central, we will
be able to swap to it once it is available.
There isn't any new original code in the Java portion, except for a new
overload in ProtoUtils that accepts Message instead of MessageLite.
Depending on Message in ProtoUtils allows us to support extra features
out-of-the-box without any changes to the generated code. For example,
JSON encoding could be supported in this way if Marshaller is enhanced.
However, now codegen must be aware of Lite in order to choose with Util
class to use. That is new code.
Eric Anderson
Rodrigo Queiro
Carl Mastrangelo
Jesse Wilson
Eric Gribkoff
ZHANG Dapeng
Shohei Kamimori
zpencer
Rodrigo Queiro
Lukasz Strzalkowski
Paul Gross
Simon Horlick
Muxi Yan
dave
nmittler