--- title: PortNameIsNotUnderNamingConvention layout: analysis-message owner: istio/wg-user-experience-maintainers test: no --- This message occurs when the port doesn't follow the [Istio service port naming convention](/docs/ops/configuration/traffic-management/protocol-selection/) or the port is unnamed. ## Example You will receive this message: {{< text plain >}} Info [IST0118] (Service httpbin.default) Port name foo-http (port: 80, targetPort: 80) doesn't follow the naming convention of Istio port. {{< /text >}} when your cluster has following service: {{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: httpbin labels: app: httpbin spec: ports: - name: foo-http port: 8000 targetPort: 80 selector: app: httpbin {{< /text >}} In this example, the port name `foo-http` does not follow the syntax: `name: [-]`. ## How to resolve - If you know the protocol the service port is serving, rename the port with `[-]` format; - If you don't know the protocol the service port is serving, you need to [query metrics from Prometheus](/docs/tasks/observability/metrics/querying-metrics/) - Run query `istio_requests_total{reporter="destination",destination_service_name="SERVICE_NAME",response_code="200"}[TIME_RANGE]`. If you are using Mixer v2, you can also run query `istio_requests_total{reporter="destination",destination_service_name="SERVICE_NAME",response_code="200",destination_port="TARGET_PORT"}[TIME_RANGE]`. - If there are outputs, you can find the `request_protocol` from the record. E.g., if the `request_protocol` is "http", rename port to "http-foo"; - If there is no output, you can leave the port as it is.