karmada-io
/
karmada
mirror of https://github.com/karmada-io/karmada.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #4469 from chaosi-zju/add-test 

test of even distribution of replicas for add cluster scenario
This commit is contained in:
karmada-bot 2023-12-25 17:26:20 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 715d46c4f2 ed33423be5
commit 46843a4c2c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 68 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

68
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler_test.go
View File

@ -363,6 +363,74 @@ func Test_EvenDistributionOfReplicas(t *testing.T) {
},
wantErr: false,
},
// Test Case No.6 of even distribution of replicas: ensure as much inertia as possible in adding cluster scenarios
// 1. create deployment (replicas=5), weight=1:1:1
// 2. check three member cluster replicas, can be 2:2:1、2:1:2、1:2:2
// 3. add a new cluster, and change static weight to 1:1:1:1
// 4. check four member cluster replicas, the replica in newly add cluster will be scale from cluster with 2 replicas previously, just like:
// * 2:2:1 --> 1:2:1:1 or 2:1:1:1
// * 2:1:2 --> 1:1:2:1 or 2:1:1:1
// * 1:2:2 --> 1:1:2:1 or 1:2:1:1
{
name: "replica 5, static weighted 1:1:1, add a new cluster and change static weight to 1:1:1:1, before change",
clusters: []*clusterv1alpha1.Cluster{
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember1),
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember2),
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember3),
},
object: workv1alpha2.ResourceBindingSpec{
Replicas: 5,
},
placement: &policyv1alpha1.Placement{
ReplicaScheduling: &policyv1alpha1.ReplicaSchedulingStrategy{
ReplicaSchedulingType: policyv1alpha1.ReplicaSchedulingTypeDivided,
ReplicaDivisionPreference: policyv1alpha1.ReplicaDivisionPreferenceWeighted,
WeightPreference: &policyv1alpha1.ClusterPreferences{
StaticWeightList: []policyv1alpha1.StaticClusterWeight{
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember1}}, Weight: 1},
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember2}}, Weight: 1},
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember3}}, Weight: 1},
},
},
},
},
previousResultToNewResult: map[string][]string{
"": {"2:2:1", "2:1:2", "1:2:2"},
},
wantErr: false,
},
{
name: "replica 5, static weighted 1:1:1, add a new cluster and change static weight to 1:1:1:1, after change",
clusters: []*clusterv1alpha1.Cluster{
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember1),
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember2),
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember3),
helper.NewCluster(ClusterMember4),
},
object: workv1alpha2.ResourceBindingSpec{
Replicas: 5,
},
placement: &policyv1alpha1.Placement{
ReplicaScheduling: &policyv1alpha1.ReplicaSchedulingStrategy{
ReplicaSchedulingType: policyv1alpha1.ReplicaSchedulingTypeDivided,
ReplicaDivisionPreference: policyv1alpha1.ReplicaDivisionPreferenceWeighted,
WeightPreference: &policyv1alpha1.ClusterPreferences{
StaticWeightList: []policyv1alpha1.StaticClusterWeight{
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember1}}, Weight: 1},
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember2}}, Weight: 1},
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember3}}, Weight: 1},
{TargetCluster: policyv1alpha1.ClusterAffinity{ClusterNames: []string{ClusterMember4}}, Weight: 1},
},
},
},
},
previousResultToNewResult: map[string][]string{
"2:2:1": {"1:2:1:1", "2:1:1:1"},
"2:1:2": {"1:1:2:1", "2:1:1:1"},
"1:2:2": {"1:1:2:1", "1:2:1:1"},
},
wantErr: false,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {