Right now, `_, ok := provider.(Notifier); !ok` can mean one of two
things:
1. The provider does not support notification because the provided
content is static.
2. The implementor of the provider hasn't gotten around to implementing
Notifier yet.
These have very different implications. We should not force consumers of
these interfaces to have to figure out the static of Notifier across
sometimes numerous different implementations. Instead, we should force
implementors to implement Notifier, even if it's a noop.
Change-Id: Ie7a26697a9a17790bfaa58d67045663bcc71e3cb
Kubernetes-commit: 9b7d654a08d694d20226609f7075b112fb18639b
We create and use a dynamic certificate provider for the SNI serving
certificates. Currently we only use static serving certificate
providers, so the files are not reloaded, but we should be able to move
to a provider that is able to reload later on.
Kubernetes-commit: 84bc6b151d0726db0c737443874577f044e0e9c8
We create and use a dynamic certificate provider for the main apiserver
serving certificates: SNI will be handled separately later. Currently we
only use static serving certificate providers, so the files are not
reloaded, but we should be able to move to a provider that is able to
reload later on.
Kubernetes-commit: 6f89f1027488aeba4af0786988c2fd2ace9a6f1d
Mike Danese
Jack Kleeman