From 20d7bc36d275655c3b33d3c816066b3e06d6f7c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: AutoExtractor Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:26:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improve error message by removing a confussing statement --- .../processors/status/eventing_scale_up_processor.go | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cluster-autoscaler/processors/status/eventing_scale_up_processor.go b/cluster-autoscaler/processors/status/eventing_scale_up_processor.go index e589655ee2..c3b8daf11d 100644 --- a/cluster-autoscaler/processors/status/eventing_scale_up_processor.go +++ b/cluster-autoscaler/processors/status/eventing_scale_up_processor.go @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ func (p *EventingScaleUpStatusProcessor) Process(context *context.AutoscalingCon if status.Result != ScaleUpSuccessful && status.Result != ScaleUpError { for _, noScaleUpInfo := range status.PodsRemainUnschedulable { context.Recorder.Event(noScaleUpInfo.Pod, apiv1.EventTypeNormal, "NotTriggerScaleUp", - fmt.Sprintf("pod didn't trigger scale-up (it wouldn't fit if a new node is"+ - " added): %s", ReasonsMessage(noScaleUpInfo, consideredNodeGroupsMap))) + fmt.Sprintf("pod didn't trigger scale-up: %s", + ReasonsMessage(noScaleUpInfo, consideredNodeGroupsMap))) } } else { klog.V(4).Infof("Skipping event processing for unschedulable pods since there is a" +