fix typo: posistive -> positive
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b327f4feb
commit
a110adf4fb
|
|
@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ The following startup parameters are supported for cluster autoscaler:
|
||||||
| `scale-down-unneeded-time` | How long a node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 10 minutes
|
| `scale-down-unneeded-time` | How long a node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 10 minutes
|
||||||
| `scale-down-unready-time` | How long an unready node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 20 minutes
|
| `scale-down-unready-time` | How long an unready node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 20 minutes
|
||||||
| `scale-down-utilization-threshold` | Node utilization level, defined as sum of requested resources divided by capacity, below which a node can be considered for scale down | 0.5
|
| `scale-down-utilization-threshold` | Node utilization level, defined as sum of requested resources divided by capacity, below which a node can be considered for scale down | 0.5
|
||||||
| `scale-down-non-empty-candidates-count` | Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to non posistive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers." | 30
|
| `scale-down-non-empty-candidates-count` | Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to non positive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers." | 30
|
||||||
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio` | A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for<br>scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to 1.0 to turn this heuristics off - CA will take all nodes as additional candidates. | 0.1
|
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio` | A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for<br>scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to 1.0 to turn this heuristics off - CA will take all nodes as additional candidates. | 0.1
|
||||||
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count` | Minimum number of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates<br>for scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid.<br>When calculating the pool size for additional candidates we take<br>`max(#nodes * scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio, scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count)` | 50
|
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count` | Minimum number of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates<br>for scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid.<br>When calculating the pool size for additional candidates we take<br>`max(#nodes * scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio, scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count)` | 50
|
||||||
| `scan-interval` | How often cluster is reevaluated for scale up or down | 10 seconds
|
| `scan-interval` | How often cluster is reevaluated for scale up or down | 10 seconds
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ var (
|
||||||
"Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain."+
|
"Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain."+
|
||||||
"Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency."+
|
"Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency."+
|
||||||
"Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)."+
|
"Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)."+
|
||||||
"Set to non posistive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers.")
|
"Set to non positive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers.")
|
||||||
scaleDownCandidatesPoolRatio = flag.Float64("scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio", 0.1,
|
scaleDownCandidatesPoolRatio = flag.Float64("scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio", 0.1,
|
||||||
"A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for"+
|
"A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for"+
|
||||||
"scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid."+
|
"scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid."+
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue