fix typo: posistive -> positive

This commit is contained in:
SataQiu 2018-11-15 15:48:08 +08:00
parent 2b327f4feb
commit a110adf4fb
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ The following startup parameters are supported for cluster autoscaler:
| `scale-down-unneeded-time` | How long a node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 10 minutes
| `scale-down-unready-time` | How long an unready node should be unneeded before it is eligible for scale down | 20 minutes
| `scale-down-utilization-threshold` | Node utilization level, defined as sum of requested resources divided by capacity, below which a node can be considered for scale down | 0.5
| `scale-down-non-empty-candidates-count` | Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to non posistive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers." | 30
| `scale-down-non-empty-candidates-count` | Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to non positive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers." | 30
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio` | A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for<br>scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid<br>Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency<br>Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)<br>Set to 1.0 to turn this heuristics off - CA will take all nodes as additional candidates. | 0.1
| `scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count` | Minimum number of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates<br>for scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid.<br>When calculating the pool size for additional candidates we take<br>`max(#nodes * scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio, scale-down-candidates-pool-min-count)` | 50
| `scan-interval` | How often cluster is reevaluated for scale up or down | 10 seconds

View File

@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ var (
"Maximum number of non empty nodes considered in one iteration as candidates for scale down with drain."+
"Lower value means better CA responsiveness but possible slower scale down latency."+
"Higher value can affect CA performance with big clusters (hundreds of nodes)."+
"Set to non posistive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers.")
"Set to non positive value to turn this heuristic off - CA will not limit the number of nodes it considers.")
scaleDownCandidatesPoolRatio = flag.Float64("scale-down-candidates-pool-ratio", 0.1,
"A ratio of nodes that are considered as additional non empty candidates for"+
"scale down when some candidates from previous iteration are no longer valid."+