SIG cluster lifecycle annual report 2022
This commit is contained in:
parent
54d49c456a
commit
1a76ec3b8b
|
@ -4,64 +4,100 @@
|
|||
|
||||
1. What work did the SIG do this year that should be highlighted?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
- We migrated the default image repository in kubeadm and some of our other k8s deployment
|
||||
tools from k8s.gcr.io to registry.k8s.io.
|
||||
- kubeadm initiated work on migrating its etcd bootstrapping to use ["learner mode"](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/3614-etcd-learner-mode)
|
||||
- We finilized migrating subprojects away from the legacy ["master" label/taint](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/2067-rename-master-label-taint)
|
||||
- We completed the setup of the ["kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-addon-provider-helm"](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-addon-provider-helm/blob/main/OWNERS) subproject providing an option for Cluster API users to manage addons, and most specifically CPI being moved out of tree.
|
||||
- We created the ["logical-cluster"](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/logical-cluster/blob/main/OWNERS) subproject to help in cases of CAPI cluster fleets.
|
||||
- We worked tighly with test-infra supporting the migration to registry.k8s.io as well as reviewing test footprint of Cluster API.
|
||||
- We started a Cluster API release team modeled from the Kubernetes release team, and this allowed the introduction of a [quarterly release cadence](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/tree/main/docs/release) for the entire 2023.
|
||||
|
||||
2. What initiatives are you working on that aren't being tracked in KEPs?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- SIG Cluster Lifecyle has not added any new KEPs that affect the whole group or the wider Kubernetes.
|
||||
New KEPs and KEP updates were only done for [kubeadm](https://git.k8s.io/enhancements/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm),
|
||||
which is the only subproject that is part of the Kubernetes release artifacts.
|
||||
Most of the activity in this group happens outside of the KEP process.
|
||||
Individual projects have implemented their own proposal tracking means, such
|
||||
as the [Cluster API CAEP process](https://sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/docs/proposals).
|
||||
- A general theme across subprojects is driving them to maturity.
|
||||
With the exception of projects like kubeadm, minikube, kOps and kubespray most of
|
||||
our other subprojects are fairly new in Kubernetes years.
|
||||
|
||||
3. KEP work in 2022 (v1.24, v1.25, v1.26):
|
||||
|
||||
As noted above, only kubeadm relies on the KEP process; work completed in 2022 includes.
|
||||
|
||||
- [KEP-2915](https://features.k8s.io/2915): Replace usage of the kubelet-config-x.y naming in kubeadm, using UnversionedKubeletConfigMap alpha:v1.23; beta: v1.24; GA: v1.25; Removed: v1.26. This is not included probably because it started in 2021.
|
||||
- [KEP-1739](https://features.k8s.io/1739): kubeadm customization with patches: kubeadm: add support for patching a "kubeletconfiguration" target #110405 v1.25. This is similar that the KEP started before 2022, and the only kubeletconfiguration patching was supported in 2022.
|
||||
- Some KEPs were retroactively updated to GA, since the work there was done without KEP updates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project health
|
||||
|
||||
1. What areas and/or subprojects does your group need the most help with?
|
||||
Any areas with 2 or fewer OWNERs? (link to more details)
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
- [cluster-api-addon-provider-helm](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-addon-provider-helm/blob/main/OWNERS)
|
||||
- [etcdadm](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcdadm)
|
||||
- [cluster-addons](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-addons)
|
||||
|
||||
2. What metrics/community health stats does your group care about and/or measure?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
- We started collecting metrics from all of our subprojects using an
|
||||
[yearly survey](https://forms.gle/xZn8DXww4XxPsXvCA). It contains a number of questions
|
||||
related to project health, OWNERS files, contributor onboarding, etc. What we saw for this annual
|
||||
report is that our OWNERS files and SIG README.md are mostly up-to-date and that subprojects are doing
|
||||
what they can to onboard new contributors. We are considering preparing some actions to better educate
|
||||
our subprojects about onboarding contributors and graduating more OWNERS. We did not do a survey
|
||||
for 2022.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Does your [CONTRIBUTING.md] help **new** contributors engage with your group specifically by pointing
|
||||
to activities or programs that provide useful context or allow easy participation?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
- As per the 2021 [survey](https://forms.gle/xZn8DXww4XxPsXvCA), we are seeing a good number of projects to keep their contributing
|
||||
documentation up-to-date. We are drafting action items for the leads to improve the understanding
|
||||
around [CONTRIBUTING.md] management. We have a few projects that have participated in LFX and GSoC
|
||||
(kOps, cluster-addons, kubeadm).
|
||||
|
||||
4. If your group has special training, requirements for reviewers/approvers, or processes beyond the general [contributor guide],
|
||||
does your [CONTRIBUTING.md] document those to help **existing** contributors grow throughout the [contributor ladder]?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Our subprojects have implemented their own contributing process and they have their own criteria
|
||||
for contributors to climb the ladders. We have not seen complains from new or existing
|
||||
contributors related to contributor guides. The SIG leads are open to help subproject leads with tips
|
||||
on this topic.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Does the group have contributors from multiple companies/affiliations?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Yes, as confirmed by our [survey](https://forms.gle/xZn8DXww4XxPsXvCA); also following
|
||||
dashboard are confirming above data:
|
||||
- https://k8s.devstats.cncf.io/d/8/company-statistics-by-repository-group?orgId=1&var-period=d7&var-metric=contributions&var-repogroup_name=SIG%20Cluster%20Lifecycle&var-repo_name=kubernetes%2Fkubernetes&var-companies=All&viewPanel=1&from=1641016800000&to=1672466400000
|
||||
- https://k8s.devstats.cncf.io/d/8/company-statistics-by-repository-group?orgId=1&var-period=d7&var-metric=contributions&var-repogroup_name=SIG%20Cluster%20Lifecycle%20(Cluster%20API)&var-repo_name=kubernetes%2Fkubernetes&var-companies=All&viewPanel=1&from=1641016800000&to=1672466400000
|
||||
|
||||
6. Are there ways end users/companies can contribute that they currently are not?
|
||||
If one of those ways is more full time support, what would they work on and why?
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
In our [survey](https://forms.gle/xZn8DXww4XxPsXvCA) results we found a few common areas where more help is needed across subprojects:
|
||||
- Code review
|
||||
- CI / e2e test monitoring and integration
|
||||
- Roadmap planning
|
||||
- Docs authoring and review
|
||||
|
||||
These areas seems suitable for both full time and part time contributors.
|
||||
Replying to user questions on Slack and other communication channels is something
|
||||
that can be considered as full time support.
|
||||
Users/companies can reach out to the subproject leads if certain details
|
||||
are missing in the [CONTRIBUTING.md] file of a subproject.
|
||||
|
||||
## Membership
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary slack channel member count:
|
||||
- Primary mailing list member count:
|
||||
- Primary meeting attendee count (estimated, if needed):
|
||||
- Primary meeting participant count (estimated, if needed):
|
||||
- Unique reviewers for SIG-owned packages: <!-- in future, this will be generated from OWNERS files referenced from subprojects, expanded with OWNERS_ALIASES files -->
|
||||
- Unique approvers for SIG-owned packages: <!-- in future, this will be generated from OWNERS files referenced from subprojects, expanded with OWNERS_ALIASES files -->
|
||||
- Primary slack channel member count: 3116
|
||||
- Primary mailing list member count: 1100+
|
||||
- Primary meeting attendee count (estimated, if needed): 5-10
|
||||
- Primary meeting participant count (estimated, if needed): 5-10
|
||||
- Unique reviewers for SIG-owned packages: 30+ <!-- in future, this will be generated from OWNERS files referenced from subprojects, expanded with OWNERS_ALIASES files -->
|
||||
- Unique approvers for SIG-owned packages: 30+ <!-- in future, this will be generated from OWNERS files referenced from subprojects, expanded with OWNERS_ALIASES files -->
|
||||
|
||||
Include any other ways you measure group membership
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -73,6 +109,7 @@ Include any other ways you measure group membership
|
|||
|
||||
- cluster-api-operator
|
||||
- cluster-api-provider-cloudstack
|
||||
- cluster-api-addon-provider-helm
|
||||
- kOps
|
||||
|
||||
**Retired in 2022:**
|
||||
|
@ -113,16 +150,15 @@ Include any other ways you measure group membership
|
|||
|
||||
Operational tasks in [sig-governance.md]:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
- [ ] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
- [x] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
- [x] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
(or created if missing and your contributor steps and experience are different or more
|
||||
in-depth than the documentation listed in the general [contributor guide] and [devel] folder.)
|
||||
- [ ] Subprojects list and linked OWNERS files in [sigs.yaml] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
- [ ] SIG leaders (chairs, tech leads, and subproject owners) in [sigs.yaml] are accurate and active, and updated if needed
|
||||
- [ ] Meeting notes and recordings for 2022 are linked from [README.md] and updated/uploaded if needed
|
||||
- [ ] Did you have community-wide updates in 2022 (e.g. community meetings, kubecon, or kubernetes-dev@ emails)? Links to email, slides, or recordings:
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
- [x] Subprojects list and linked OWNERS files in [sigs.yaml] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
|
||||
- [x] SIG leaders (chairs, tech leads, and subproject owners) in [sigs.yaml] are accurate and active, and updated if needed
|
||||
- [x] Meeting notes and recordings for 2022 are linked from [README.md] and updated/uploaded if needed
|
||||
- [x] Did you have community-wide updates in 2022 (e.g. community meetings, kubecon, or kubernetes-dev@ emails)? Links to email, slides, or recordings:
|
||||
- We had both [KubeCon EU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H8flXm_lKk) and [KubeCon NA](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zo0cWYU0fM) sessions in 2022
|
||||
|
||||
[CONTRIBUTING.md]: https://git.k8s.io/community/sig-cluster-lifecycle/CONTRIBUTING.md
|
||||
[contributor ladder]: https://git.k8s.io/community/community-membership.md
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue