Add 2019 Q2 planning doc

Signed-off-by: Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Aimee Ukasick 2019-11-12 13:10:56 -06:00
parent a06dfbdab3
commit 1deb98fb22
1 changed files with 232 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
# SIG Docs Q2 2019 Planning
**Q1 Review, Q2 Planning**
**28 March 2019, 6-9pm Pacific**
Authors: Zach Corliessen, Jennifer Rondeau, Jared Bhatti
# Introduction (10 minutes)
- Welcome and introductions
- Overview
- (Zach C) Proposals: not sure where best to include this section, we'll evaluate and iterate accordingly
# Q1 Review (45 minutes)
## Wins
- 1.2 million page views per week! Up from 1 mil last quarter!
- 1.14 Release (thanks Jim Angel and all the shadows!)
- 2x number of localizations (French, Italian, German have been
added!)
## Goals
For each goal: carry forward to Q2? (Y/N)
- Q1 (Jan-March)
- Onboarding new devs / admins
- Define the content plan (Steve Perry)
- Deliverable: Github project w/ list of issues detailing new onboarding content.
- **Grade: .7, Very close to done**
- **Carry forward? YES**
- What is K8s? (overview) (Brad, Andrew)
- Deliverable: Plan out the concepts and content for a new user understanding k8s, meaningful progress on content.
- **Grade: .5, PR in flight. https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/12884**
- **Carry forward? YES**
- Setup \--\> Getting Started (Jennifer, Chris, Cody)
- Deliverable: Formulate a list of milestones for Chris. Define new list of content.
- **Grade: .1, discussion and plan in progress, blocked on hiring. **
- **Carry Forward: Yes**
- Redoing User Journeys (Andrew)
- Deliverable: Create plan and hand off to another.
- **Grade: 1, Done, in card-based system now.**
- **Carry forward? No, done :)**
- Admins: set up a cluster, how to secure clusters (Zach A)
- Deliverable: Define a prioritized list of topics that need to be documented for users.
- **Grade: .4, Zach A created a working group and is making progress.**
- **Carry forward? YES**
- 1.14 release (Jim Angel)
- Release 1.14 docs, Defining/Documenting release docs process (Jim, Jared, Cody)
- **Grade: 1, Release in great shape**
- **Carry forward? No, done :)**
- Deliverable: 1.15 handoff complete doc, create release playbook for
1.15 and ongoing releases, doc generation process is documented and
works smoothly, & find a home for the content (sig-release vs
contrib guide).
- **Grade .9 Doc in flight, Cody and Jim working on publishing in April.**
- **Carry forward? No, done-ish?**
- Meta information architecture (scope and strategy) (Zach, Steve)
- Deliverable: Make a decision on Pwittrock's Kubectl Docs, determine integration.
- **Grade: .1 No decision made. **
- **Carry forward: Yes, but deeper conversation needed on how SIG-Docs handles subdomain content. **
- Accessibility (Rajakavitha Kodhandapani, Cody Clark)
- Deliverable: Make plan with prioritized list of fundamental accessibility issues that need to be addressed.
- **Grade .5 Plan in progress, Draft Started (**[***here***](https://hackmd.io/jB6Q7nSoTgiGcV4Oc_4rjg)**)**
- **Carry Forward: Two sections: One for accessibility for writers, one for accessibility for the site itself. What we have**
# Year-long 2019 Goals (30 minutes)
- Onboarding new devs and admins
- Setup \--\> Getting Started
- Progress: **0**
- Explaining basic and intermediate concepts better
- Do we approach content improvement by:
- Analytics-driven?
- SIG-driven?
- (Zach C) Repo project with issues worked really well for Q1, let's carry that approach forward
- (Brad) These aren't an automatic either/or binary; we can do both.
- (Jennifer) What are our analytics telling us? Are they really a meaningful driver for doc improvement?
- (Zach A) Examine page bounce rates/most time on page for metrics?
- (Zach C) Bucket content, create issues, inform priorities by analytics, and get started. AGILE, not waterfall!
- (Jim) Look at most-visited pages,
- Expanding task documentation
- Worth approaching separately from SIG-driven docs
- New contributor AMA, blog post, reach out to existing channels, contributor day at Barcelona
- Improving Docs Process:
- Review PR review process (PR Wrangling)
- In good shape, but provide time commitments/expectations clearly
- Release Notes Process
- Progress: **Jennifer can mentor, but someone else needs to own/drive**
- **Publicize this to find an interested contributor to own/drive**
- **Mike Arpaia (sp?) can also mentor/review**
- Better CLI and Admin documentation
- Progress: **0**
- **Discuss after subdomain convo**
- Meta information architecture (scope and strategy) (Evaluating KubeAdm docs and FMC)
- Models?
- Andrew drove previously; we need a concrete plan for where they go and who drives it
- Dominic's involvement is not unbounded; we need to respect his time
- Steve Perry may be a useful resource/driver
- Jennifer: Engage with Steve Perry as well
- Jared: Create a blog post to detail the work/scope, provide examples, highlight the top posts
- Security Documentation & Bulletins
- Progress: **Yes, Zach A is taking it on in Q2**
- Site UX
- Progress:
- Jared: Do we own this? We should decide. If we own it, then we need to find the expertise to do this?
- Paris: Chat with SIG-UI!
- Zach: We will likely need to hire someone
- Jennifer: UX includes more than UI design, and should. Some of it is information architecture/content design, which sig-docs would need to own.
- Accessibility
- Progress: **Yes, Rajie and Cody will drive in Q2**
- Version Skew / Docs \[Jim A. - owning in Q3\]
- [*https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/14307*](https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/14307)
- [*https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/issues/626*](https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/issues/626)
- Example: [*https://www.kernel.org/*](https://www.kernel.org/)
# Break (10 minutes)
# Proposals (45 minutes)
## From Dani Comnea:
- Differentiate the lifecycle/ administration (including how the certs are
generated, how to rotate them, whether rotation is out of the box etc ) of a
kubeadm cluster and the non-kubeadm cluster
- (Jennifer) Remove the technical debt/resolve the information architecture for this specific task, may provide a model for others to follow.
- Align the documentation tasks like "Operating etcd clusters" around the static pods.
- Reviewing information architecture\--if Dani wants to drive, great! Probably not a SIG-wide goal for Q2
- Should "Install Minikube" task be moved under setup section?
- Link from Setup, keep in tutorial
- Group tools under Reference section under one sub-topic
- Yes, we should absolutely re-organize IA in Q2.
- (Jennifer) It's great, but let's plan it in Q2 and do it in Q3.
- If Dani wants to drive, great!
- Should docs move to a vertical approach like is been suggested
[*https://groups.google.com/forum/\#!topic/kubernetes-sig-cli/kJ2rbTffins*](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-cli/kJ2rbTffins)? Maybe at least in the tutorial section?
- (Jennifer) Narrative approach is historically complex; involve Steve Perry in discussion.
- (Jared) Tutorial approach is narrative but semi-incoherent; narrative approach may make sense, but needs to be coherent. For other sections of the site, it may make sense to take a narrative approach, but\--whose narrative? Makes clearer sense for tutorials.
- How do we handle subdomains and their content?
- Zach:
- Danger: What is under the umbrella of SIG-Docs? Is our workflow a barrier for people who commit content?
- Opportunity: This issue is due to the wild success of k8s. Listen and engage with content creators.
- Jared:
- Let a million flowers bloom, but let's set some standards as to what's in and what's out.
- Do we provide some minimal content/requirements for subdomains? ("This is a subdomain for out-of-tree code. For in-tree code, visit kubernetes.io.")
- Code of conduct adherence is mandatory.
- We don't build anything; we provide pathways for integration.
- (Zach A) We need to codify a statement of policy/intent/best practices for subdomain content.
## From Zach C:
- Provide structured opportunities for mentorship and contribution
- New Contributor Ambassador
- Issue Triage Captain
- Whole path mentorship from New Contributor to Approver
- Mentoring replacements for chairs
# Q2 Goals (30 minutes)
- Forward goals from Q1
- Goals from yearly priorities
- Goals from proposals
Q2 review/Q3 planning at KubeCon Shanghai with asynchronous involvement
beginning 3-4 weeks before in well-bounded discussions at weekly meetings.