Add 2019 Q2 planning doc
Signed-off-by: Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a06dfbdab3
commit
1deb98fb22
|
@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
|
|||
# SIG Docs Q2 2019 Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Q1 Review, Q2 Planning**
|
||||
|
||||
**28 March 2019, 6-9pm Pacific**
|
||||
|
||||
Authors: Zach Corliessen, Jennifer Rondeau, Jared Bhatti
|
||||
|
||||
# Introduction (10 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
- Welcome and introductions
|
||||
- Overview
|
||||
|
||||
- (Zach C) Proposals: not sure where best to include this section, we'll evaluate and iterate accordingly
|
||||
|
||||
# Q1 Review (45 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Wins
|
||||
|
||||
- 1.2 million page views per week! Up from 1 mil last quarter!
|
||||
- 1.14 Release (thanks Jim Angel and all the shadows!)
|
||||
- 2x number of localizations (French, Italian, German have been
|
||||
added!)
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals
|
||||
|
||||
For each goal: carry forward to Q2? (Y/N)
|
||||
|
||||
- Q1 (Jan-March)
|
||||
|
||||
- Onboarding new devs / admins
|
||||
|
||||
- Define the content plan (Steve Perry)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Github project w/ list of issues detailing new onboarding content.
|
||||
- **Grade: .7, Very close to done**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? YES**
|
||||
|
||||
- What is K8s? (overview) (Brad, Andrew)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Plan out the concepts and content for a new user understanding k8s, meaningful progress on content.
|
||||
- **Grade: .5, PR in flight. https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/12884**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? YES**
|
||||
|
||||
- Setup \--\> Getting Started (Jennifer, Chris, Cody)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Formulate a list of milestones for Chris. Define new list of content.
|
||||
- **Grade: .1, discussion and plan in progress, blocked on hiring. **
|
||||
- **Carry Forward: Yes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Redoing User Journeys (Andrew)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Create plan and hand off to another.
|
||||
- **Grade: 1, Done, in card-based system now.**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? No, done :)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Admins: set up a cluster, how to secure clusters (Zach A)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Define a prioritized list of topics that need to be documented for users.
|
||||
- **Grade: .4, Zach A created a working group and is making progress.**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? YES**
|
||||
|
||||
- 1.14 release (Jim Angel)
|
||||
|
||||
- Release 1.14 docs, Defining/Documenting release docs process (Jim, Jared, Cody)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Grade: 1, Release in great shape**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? No, done :)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: 1.15 handoff complete doc, create release playbook for
|
||||
1.15 and ongoing releases, doc generation process is documented and
|
||||
works smoothly, & find a home for the content (sig-release vs
|
||||
contrib guide).
|
||||
|
||||
- **Grade .9 Doc in flight, Cody and Jim working on publishing in April.**
|
||||
- **Carry forward? No, done-ish?**
|
||||
|
||||
- Meta information architecture (scope and strategy) (Zach, Steve)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Make a decision on Pwittrock's Kubectl Docs, determine integration.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Grade: .1 No decision made. **
|
||||
- **Carry forward: Yes, but deeper conversation needed on how SIG-Docs handles subdomain content. **
|
||||
|
||||
- Accessibility (Rajakavitha Kodhandapani, Cody Clark)
|
||||
|
||||
- Deliverable: Make plan with prioritized list of fundamental accessibility issues that need to be addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Grade .5 Plan in progress, Draft Started (**[***here***](https://hackmd.io/jB6Q7nSoTgiGcV4Oc_4rjg)**)**
|
||||
- **Carry Forward: Two sections: One for accessibility for writers, one for accessibility for the site itself. What we have**
|
||||
|
||||
# Year-long 2019 Goals (30 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
- Onboarding new devs and admins
|
||||
|
||||
- Setup \--\> Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress: **0**
|
||||
|
||||
- Explaining basic and intermediate concepts better
|
||||
|
||||
- Do we approach content improvement by:
|
||||
|
||||
- Analytics-driven?
|
||||
- SIG-driven?
|
||||
- (Zach C) Repo project with issues worked really well for Q1, let's carry that approach forward
|
||||
- (Brad) These aren't an automatic either/or binary; we can do both.
|
||||
- (Jennifer) What are our analytics telling us? Are they really a meaningful driver for doc improvement?
|
||||
- (Zach A) Examine page bounce rates/most time on page for metrics?
|
||||
- (Zach C) Bucket content, create issues, inform priorities by analytics, and get started. AGILE, not waterfall!
|
||||
- (Jim) Look at most-visited pages,
|
||||
|
||||
- Expanding task documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- Worth approaching separately from SIG-driven docs
|
||||
- New contributor AMA, blog post, reach out to existing channels, contributor day at Barcelona
|
||||
|
||||
- Improving Docs Process:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review PR review process (PR Wrangling)
|
||||
|
||||
- In good shape, but provide time commitments/expectations clearly
|
||||
|
||||
- Release Notes Process
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress: **Jennifer can mentor, but someone else needs to own/drive**
|
||||
- **Publicize this to find an interested contributor to own/drive**
|
||||
- **Mike Arpaia (sp?) can also mentor/review**
|
||||
|
||||
- Better CLI and Admin documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress: **0**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Discuss after subdomain convo**
|
||||
|
||||
- Meta information architecture (scope and strategy) (Evaluating KubeAdm docs and FMC)
|
||||
|
||||
- Models?
|
||||
|
||||
- Andrew drove previously; we need a concrete plan for where they go and who drives it
|
||||
- Dominic's involvement is not unbounded; we need to respect his time
|
||||
- Steve Perry may be a useful resource/driver
|
||||
- Jennifer: Engage with Steve Perry as well
|
||||
- Jared: Create a blog post to detail the work/scope, provide examples, highlight the top posts
|
||||
|
||||
- Security Documentation & Bulletins
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress: **Yes, Zach A is taking it on in Q2**
|
||||
|
||||
- Site UX
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress:
|
||||
|
||||
- Jared: Do we own this? We should decide. If we own it, then we need to find the expertise to do this?
|
||||
- Paris: Chat with SIG-UI!
|
||||
- Zach: We will likely need to hire someone
|
||||
- Jennifer: UX includes more than UI design, and should. Some of it is information architecture/content design, which sig-docs would need to own.
|
||||
|
||||
- Accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress: **Yes, Rajie and Cody will drive in Q2**
|
||||
|
||||
- Version Skew / Docs \[Jim A. - owning in Q3\]
|
||||
|
||||
- [*https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/14307*](https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/14307)
|
||||
- [*https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/issues/626*](https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/issues/626)
|
||||
- Example: [*https://www.kernel.org/*](https://www.kernel.org/)
|
||||
|
||||
# Break (10 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
# Proposals (45 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
## From Dani Comnea:
|
||||
|
||||
- Differentiate the lifecycle/ administration (including how the certs are
|
||||
generated, how to rotate them, whether rotation is out of the box etc ) of a
|
||||
kubeadm cluster and the non-kubeadm cluster
|
||||
|
||||
- (Jennifer) Remove the technical debt/resolve the information architecture for this specific task, may provide a model for others to follow.
|
||||
|
||||
- Align the documentation tasks like "Operating etcd clusters" around the static pods.
|
||||
|
||||
- Reviewing information architecture\--if Dani wants to drive, great! Probably not a SIG-wide goal for Q2
|
||||
|
||||
- Should "Install Minikube" task be moved under setup section?
|
||||
|
||||
- Link from Setup, keep in tutorial
|
||||
|
||||
- Group tools under Reference section under one sub-topic
|
||||
|
||||
- Yes, we should absolutely re-organize IA in Q2.
|
||||
- (Jennifer) It's great, but let's plan it in Q2 and do it in Q3.
|
||||
- If Dani wants to drive, great!
|
||||
|
||||
- Should docs move to a vertical approach like is been suggested
|
||||
[*https://groups.google.com/forum/\#!topic/kubernetes-sig-cli/kJ2rbTffins*](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-cli/kJ2rbTffins)? Maybe at least in the tutorial section?
|
||||
|
||||
- (Jennifer) Narrative approach is historically complex; involve Steve Perry in discussion.
|
||||
- (Jared) Tutorial approach is narrative but semi-incoherent; narrative approach may make sense, but needs to be coherent. For other sections of the site, it may make sense to take a narrative approach, but\--whose narrative? Makes clearer sense for tutorials.
|
||||
|
||||
- How do we handle subdomains and their content?
|
||||
|
||||
- Zach:
|
||||
|
||||
- Danger: What is under the umbrella of SIG-Docs? Is our workflow a barrier for people who commit content?
|
||||
- Opportunity: This issue is due to the wild success of k8s. Listen and engage with content creators.
|
||||
|
||||
- Jared:
|
||||
|
||||
- Let a million flowers bloom, but let's set some standards as to what's in and what's out.
|
||||
- Do we provide some minimal content/requirements for subdomains? ("This is a subdomain for out-of-tree code. For in-tree code, visit kubernetes.io.")
|
||||
- Code of conduct adherence is mandatory.
|
||||
- We don't build anything; we provide pathways for integration.
|
||||
- (Zach A) We need to codify a statement of policy/intent/best practices for subdomain content.
|
||||
|
||||
## From Zach C:
|
||||
|
||||
- Provide structured opportunities for mentorship and contribution
|
||||
|
||||
- New Contributor Ambassador
|
||||
- Issue Triage Captain
|
||||
- Whole path mentorship from New Contributor to Approver
|
||||
- Mentoring replacements for chairs
|
||||
|
||||
# Q2 Goals (30 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
- Forward goals from Q1
|
||||
- Goals from yearly priorities
|
||||
- Goals from proposals
|
||||
|
||||
Q2 review/Q3 planning at KubeCon Shanghai with asynchronous involvement
|
||||
beginning 3-4 weeks before in well-bounded discussions at weekly meetings.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue