SIG Autoscaling 2021 - Address report feedback

This commit is contained in:
GuyTempleton 2022-04-14 23:38:11 +01:00
parent 5c5de2f16b
commit 3634be934e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 99AE81768FDD63A8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
1. What work did the SIG do this year that should be highlighted? 1. What work did the SIG do this year that should be highlighted?
- Promotion of autoscaling v2 API to GA - [Promotion of autoscaling v2 API to GA.](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2703)
- Continued improvements of VPA via community feedback - [Continued improvements of VPA via community feedback](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/issues/3913)
- Improved extensibility of Cluster Autoscaler - [Improved extensibility of Cluster Autoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/proposals/plugable-provider-grpc.md)
2. What initiatives are you working on that aren't being tracked in KEPs? 2. What initiatives are you working on that aren't being tracked in KEPs?
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ In future, this will be generated from kubernetes/enhancements kep.yaml files
- Code contributors and reviewers - Code contributors and reviewers
- Issue triage/response - Issue triage/response
- Whilst there are no areas with explicitly 2 or few owners, there are a number of areas where we have this few subject matter experts, acting as a significant bottleneck for significant changes - Whilst there are no areas with explicitly 2 or few owners, there are a number of areas where we have this few subject matter experts, acting as a significant bottleneck for significant changes. These currently include the core Cluster Autoscaler code, as well as the HPA controller.
2. What metrics/community health stats does your group care about and/or measure? 2. What metrics/community health stats does your group care about and/or measure?
@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ In future, this will be generated from kubernetes/enhancements kep.yaml files
5. Does the group have contributors from multiple companies/affiliations? 5. Does the group have contributors from multiple companies/affiliations?
- Yes - though the core approvers are almost all from a single company. - Yes - though the core approvers are almost all from a single company (Google). Other contributors/code owners are from a variety of companies, including end users (Datadog, Airbnb, Skyscanner...) and vendors (Microsoft, Red Hat, Amazon...), particularly for Cluster Autoscaler cloud provider implementations.
6. Are there ways end users/companies can contribute that they currently are not? 6. Are there ways end users/companies can contribute that they currently are not?
If one of those ways is more full time support, what would they work on and why? If one of those ways is more full time support, what would they work on and why?
- Increased support for some cloud provider implementations for the Cluster Autoscaler - Increased support for some cloud provider implementations for the Cluster Autoscaler. See e.g. [issues](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aarea%2Fprovider%2Faws+) and [pull requests](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Aarea%2Fprovider%2Fhetzner) which can be queried by cloud provider for starting points. (Modify the label filter as appropriate from the above links.)
- Responding to issues - the SIG currently lacks the capacity to respond to all issues raised - Responding to issues - the SIG currently lacks the capacity to respond to all issues raised
## Membership ## Membership