kubernetes
/
community
mirror of https://github.com/kubernetes/community.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

SIG Autoscaling 2021 - Address report feedback

This commit is contained in:
GuyTempleton 2022-04-14 23:38:11 +01:00
parent 5c5de2f16b
commit 3634be934e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 99AE81768FDD63A8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
sig-autoscaling/annual-report-2021.md
View File

@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
1. What work did the SIG do this year that should be highlighted?
- Promotion of autoscaling v2 API to GA
- Continued improvements of VPA via community feedback
- Improved extensibility of Cluster Autoscaler
- [Promotion of autoscaling v2 API to GA.](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2703)
- [Continued improvements of VPA via community feedback](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/issues/3913)
- [Improved extensibility of Cluster Autoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/proposals/plugable-provider-grpc.md)
2. What initiatives are you working on that aren't being tracked in KEPs?
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ In future, this will be generated from kubernetes/enhancements kep.yaml files
- Code contributors and reviewers
- Issue triage/response
- Whilst there are no areas with explicitly 2 or few owners, there are a number of areas where we have this few subject matter experts, acting as a significant bottleneck for significant changes
- Whilst there are no areas with explicitly 2 or few owners, there are a number of areas where we have this few subject matter experts, acting as a significant bottleneck for significant changes. These currently include the core Cluster Autoscaler code, as well as the HPA controller.
2. What metrics/community health stats does your group care about and/or measure?
@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ In future, this will be generated from kubernetes/enhancements kep.yaml files
5. Does the group have contributors from multiple companies/affiliations?
- Yes - though the core approvers are almost all from a single company.
- Yes - though the core approvers are almost all from a single company (Google). Other contributors/code owners are from a variety of companies, including end users (Datadog, Airbnb, Skyscanner...) and vendors (Microsoft, Red Hat, Amazon...), particularly for Cluster Autoscaler cloud provider implementations.
6. Are there ways end users/companies can contribute that they currently are not?
If one of those ways is more full time support, what would they work on and why?
- Increased support for some cloud provider implementations for the Cluster Autoscaler
- Increased support for some cloud provider implementations for the Cluster Autoscaler. See e.g. [issues](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aarea%2Fprovider%2Faws+) and [pull requests](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Aarea%2Fprovider%2Fhetzner) which can be queried by cloud provider for starting points. (Modify the label filter as appropriate from the above links.)
- Responding to issues - the SIG currently lacks the capacity to respond to all issues raised
## Membership