Fix mistakes about the example of resource account for burstable pods and typo mistake

This commit is contained in:
Ziqi Zhao 2018-04-14 20:55:46 +08:00
parent 5364144804
commit 369e86bb95
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ of a compressible resource that was requested by a pod in a higher QoS tier.
The `kubelet` will support a flag `experimental-qos-reserved` that
takes a set of percentages per incompressible resource that controls how the
QoS cgroup sandbox attempts to reserve resources for its tier. It attempts
to reserve requested resources to exclude pods from lower OoS classes from
to reserve requested resources to exclude pods from lower QoS classes from
using resources requested by higher QoS classes. The flag will accept values
in a range from 0-100%, where a value of `0%` instructs the `kubelet` to attempt
no reservation, and a value of `100%` will instruct the `kubelet` to attempt to
@ -564,10 +564,10 @@ Pod3 and Pod4 are both classified as Burstable and are hence nested under
the Burstable cgroup.
```
/ROOT/burstable/cpu.shares = 30m
/ROOT/burstable/cpu.shares = 130m
/ROOT/burstable/memory.limit_in_bytes = Allocatable - 5Gi
/ROOT/burstable/Pod3/cpu.quota = 150m
/ROOT/burstable/Pod3/cpu.shares = 20m
/ROOT/burstable/Pod3/cpu.shares = 120m
/ROOT/burstable/Pod3/memory.limit_in_bytes = 3Gi
/ROOT/burstable/Pod4/cpu.quota = 20m
/ROOT/burstable/Pod4/cpu.shares = 10m