fixs typo: dont -> don't

This commit is contained in:
JoeWrightss 2018-11-05 22:20:03 +08:00
parent 79748734e6
commit 72b2d4386c
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ For each creation or update for a Deployment, it will:
is the one that the new RS uses and collisionCount is a counter in the DeploymentStatus
that increments every time a [hash collision](#hashing-collisions) happens (hash
collisions should be rare with fnv).
- If the RSs and pods dont already have this label and selector:
- If the RSs and pods don't already have this label and selector:
- We will first add this to RS.PodTemplateSpec.Metadata.Labels for all RSs to
ensure that all new pods that they create will have this label.
- Then we will add this label to their existing pods

View File

@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Docker API does not provide user-namespace mapping. Therefore to handle `GetRunt
## Future Work
### Namespace-Level/Pod-Level user-namespace support
There is no runtime today which supports creating containers with a specified user namespace configuration. For example here is the discussion related to this support in Docker https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/28593
Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support containers request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we dont expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support containers request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we don't expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
### Remote Volumes
Remote Volumes support should be investigated and should be targeted in future once support is there at lower infra layers.