fixs typo: dont -> don't
This commit is contained in:
parent
79748734e6
commit
72b2d4386c
|
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ For each creation or update for a Deployment, it will:
|
|||
is the one that the new RS uses and collisionCount is a counter in the DeploymentStatus
|
||||
that increments every time a [hash collision](#hashing-collisions) happens (hash
|
||||
collisions should be rare with fnv).
|
||||
- If the RSs and pods dont already have this label and selector:
|
||||
- If the RSs and pods don't already have this label and selector:
|
||||
- We will first add this to RS.PodTemplateSpec.Metadata.Labels for all RSs to
|
||||
ensure that all new pods that they create will have this label.
|
||||
- Then we will add this label to their existing pods
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Docker API does not provide user-namespace mapping. Therefore to handle `GetRunt
|
|||
## Future Work
|
||||
### Namespace-Level/Pod-Level user-namespace support
|
||||
There is no runtime today which supports creating containers with a specified user namespace configuration. For example here is the discussion related to this support in Docker https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/28593
|
||||
Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support container’s request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we dont expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
|
||||
Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support container’s request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we don't expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
|
||||
### Remote Volumes
|
||||
Remote Volumes support should be investigated and should be targeted in future once support is there at lower infra layers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue