Add Code of Conduct Committee Charter
This commit is contained in:
parent
c12a35b09b
commit
76d80f5899
|
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ To understand how this file is generated, see https://git.k8s.io/community/gener
|
|||
|
||||
The Kubernetes Code of Conduct Committee (CoCC) is the body that is responsible for enforcing and maintaining the Kubernetes Code of Conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
The [charter](charter.md) defines the scope and governance of the Code of Conduct Committee.
|
||||
|
||||
## Members
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
|
|||
# Kubernetes Code of Conduct Committee Charter
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission/Purpose
|
||||
Our primary concern is creating and maintaining a safe and respectful community.
|
||||
Our role is to provide and enforce a well-considered viewpoint on what
|
||||
constitutes acceptable behavior within our community. The [Code of
|
||||
Conduct](https://git.k8s.io/community/code-of-conduct.md) serves as the primary
|
||||
policy document and is supported with additional references and tools as needed.
|
||||
Since maintaining a safe environment is a very large part of what the committee
|
||||
does, we must carefully balance transparency of process with preserving the
|
||||
privacy of those who come to the committee or other community leaders with an
|
||||
incident report.
|
||||
|
||||
The committee understands how challenging these matters are for everyone
|
||||
involved, and that the process is never perfect by nature of its need to serve
|
||||
everyone in the community equally. That said, the committee is oriented toward
|
||||
the protection of our community and takes that duty seriously.
|
||||
|
||||
## Communication with the committee
|
||||
The committee maintains a private mailing list for reporting incidents, asking
|
||||
confidential questions, and internal committee communication:
|
||||
|
||||
[conduct@kubernetes.io][email]
|
||||
|
||||
This email alias may not be the fastest path to a response in urgent situations.
|
||||
**If a response is time critical, reaching individual committee members via
|
||||
Slack is advisable. But an email must also be sent to
|
||||
[conduct@kubernetes.io][email] for tracking purposes**. This feedback helps
|
||||
guide the implementation of new policies and procedures.
|
||||
|
||||
### Others acting on behalf of the committee
|
||||
Community moderation administrators in Slack, the mailing list, community
|
||||
events, and elsewhere are extensions of the committee and are able to be first
|
||||
responders to incidents. They are explicitly empowered to take those actions
|
||||
necessary to protect the community, especially when no committee members are
|
||||
available. All such events must be retroactively reviewed by the committee for
|
||||
appropriateness and consistency.
|
||||
|
||||
Steering committee members may also act in limited cases to enforce the code of
|
||||
conduct. Examples of this may be the deletion of GitHub comments, offensive
|
||||
Slack messages, or the eviction of bad actors from public meetings. These
|
||||
actions must be communicated to the committee for review.
|
||||
|
||||
## Composition and Scope
|
||||
The [committee is composed of 5
|
||||
members](https://git.k8s.io/community/committee-code-of-conduct) elected by the
|
||||
Steering Committee based on private nomination. During an election, the two
|
||||
candidates that received the most committee votes are granted 2 year terms, with
|
||||
the remaining person given a one year term.
|
||||
|
||||
The committee is the primary recipient of all conduct complaints regardless of
|
||||
where in the community they originate. The only exception is at CNCF events,
|
||||
where the event Code of Conduct process supersedes this. That is primarily due
|
||||
to the high-impact nature of in-person violations and the need for more
|
||||
extensive staffing. This committee should be informed and consulted for all
|
||||
violations involving Kubernetes community members, regardless of circumstances.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally, the committee is responsible for drafting and executing on
|
||||
reporting, enforcement, and other policy matters. In most cases, policies are
|
||||
made public, however some materials will be confidential by nature of their
|
||||
content and application. As a general rule, the committee will provide as much
|
||||
transparency as possible, except in specific incident reports where no
|
||||
personally-identifying information about the reporter/reported will be shared.
|
||||
Anonymized aggregated incident data may be provided to the community as the
|
||||
committee sees fit.
|
||||
|
||||
*The Kubernetes Steering Committee has explicitly delegated all Code of Conduct
|
||||
authority and enforcement to this committee. The committee can, at its
|
||||
discretion, delegate some authority to those tasked with enforcement.*
|
||||
|
||||
## Committee Operation
|
||||
The committee strives to respond quickly to reports, as well as initiate
|
||||
whatever actions are appropriate based on severity, risk, urgency, and impact.
|
||||
In some cases, this requires individual committee members to [take
|
||||
immediate](https://git.k8s.io/community/communication/moderation.md) action such
|
||||
as (but not limited to) removing a GitHub comment, deleting a Slack message, or
|
||||
ejecting someone from a community meeting. The committee, however, will
|
||||
retroactively review any action taken in such instances to ensure it was
|
||||
appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
The committee meets biweekly unless additional interstitial meetings are
|
||||
required to address incidents or other critical work. Meetings are not recorded,
|
||||
however confidential notes may be kept when necessary to provide continuity to
|
||||
future committee members. Wherever possible, documentation necessary for the
|
||||
internal operation of the committee will be stored in a private GitHub
|
||||
repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Meeting quorum
|
||||
Meetings are considered at quorum when a simple majority of the members are
|
||||
present. Where there are 4 or fewer members available due vacant seats or
|
||||
recusal, quorum is 2. Note that many decisions are not able to be implemented in
|
||||
situations where only 2 members are present.
|
||||
|
||||
### Policy change ratification
|
||||
Any changes to the charter require explicit LGTM or Approve from all active
|
||||
committee members. For pull requests, a /hold will be applied until all
|
||||
approvals are present. Any changes merged without consensus will be reverted.
|
||||
|
||||
### Incident report confidentiality
|
||||
The Code of Conduct committee will keep your report confidential. The CoCC may
|
||||
share report information with the Steering Committee if they believe doing so is
|
||||
appropriate. Past incidents are communicated generally to new committee members
|
||||
so they can have historical context for future issues. While this may allow the
|
||||
establishment of bias in new members it is believed that the educational value
|
||||
of this information outweighs the potential negatives.
|
||||
|
||||
### Incident Response Recusal
|
||||
A member of the Code of Conduct committee shall recuse themselves from
|
||||
evaluating and responding to any incident for which they are unable to be
|
||||
impartial. If a committee member does not recuse themselves they may be removed
|
||||
from participation by a unanimous vote of all other members of the committee.
|
||||
|
||||
### Committee seats unoccupied
|
||||
In the event that one or more of the seats on the committee is occupied, for any
|
||||
reason, a replacement member will be appointed by the steering committee as soon
|
||||
as reasonable. That person will serve out the remainder of the term of the
|
||||
person they are replacing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Committee dissolution
|
||||
If committee members believe that the committee is no longer able to act in
|
||||
accordance with the above Mission/Purpose the committee may vote to dissolve.
|
||||
The committee should specify a date of dissolution. Dissolution requires an
|
||||
affirmative vote of more than 75% of committee members. If the committee is
|
||||
dissolved all seats are vacated on the date specified.
|
||||
|
||||
### Removal
|
||||
A committee member may be removed from the committee by a unanimous decision of
|
||||
the other committee members. The member should be given the opportunity to
|
||||
resign before they are removed. Removal should only be considered for the
|
||||
following reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
* The member has been found to have committed a code of conduct violation.
|
||||
* The member is convicted of a felony.
|
||||
* The member has been completely out of contact for more than 30 consecutive
|
||||
calendar days without having made prior arrangements.
|
||||
* The member has explicitly, publicly violated the privacy of individuals
|
||||
involved by disclosure of personally-identifiable information (accidental
|
||||
disclosure via inference is not a valid reason for removal, though may be
|
||||
cause for a code of conduct violation report.)
|
||||
* The member is no longer able to perform the duties of the position due to
|
||||
extreme circumstances such as refugee displacement or diminution of mental
|
||||
capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
### Resignation
|
||||
If a committee member chooses not to continue in their role, for whatever
|
||||
self-elected reason, they must notify the committee as well as the steering
|
||||
committee in writing. As a courtesy, such notifications should be given at least
|
||||
30 calendar days in advance of their departure.
|
||||
|
||||
[email]: conduct@kubernetes.io
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue