Merge pull request #1392 from purpuregecko/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue. fix links to CRI. issue #1391
This commit is contained in:
commit
76f2ea4795
|
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ agent.
|
|||
Each node runs a container runtime, which is responsible for downloading images and running containers.
|
||||
|
||||
Kubelet does not link in the base container runtime. Instead, we're defining a
|
||||
[Container Runtime Interface](container-runtime-interface-v1.md) to control the
|
||||
[Container Runtime Interface](/contributors/devel/container-runtime-interface.md) to control the
|
||||
underlying runtime and facilitate pluggability of that layer.
|
||||
This decoupling is needed in order to maintain clear component boundaries, facilitate testing, and facilitate pluggability.
|
||||
Runtimes supported today, either upstream or by forks, include at least docker (for Linux and Windows),
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ already underway for Docker, called
|
|||
## Container Runtime Interface
|
||||
|
||||
Other container runtimes will likely add AppArmor support eventually, so the
|
||||
[Container Runtime Interface](container-runtime-interface-v1.md) (CRI) needs to be made compatible
|
||||
[Container Runtime Interface](/contributors/devel/container-runtime-interface.md) (CRI) needs to be made compatible
|
||||
with this design. The two important pieces are a way to report whether AppArmor is supported by the
|
||||
runtime, and a way to specify the profile to load (likely through the `LinuxContainerConfig`).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue