Add FAQ section on how to avoid excessive LIST load when writing apps
This commit is contained in:
parent
bebdabe4de
commit
78a4fded6a
|
@ -62,6 +62,31 @@ summarized as:
|
|||
- if you can't keep your object size below 100kB, reach out to SIG
|
||||
Scalability and discuss the usecase to see how we can make it performant
|
||||
|
||||
### How should we code client applications to improve scalability?
|
||||
|
||||
As noted above, LIST requests can be particularly expensive. So when working with lists
|
||||
that may have more than a few thousand elements, consider these guidelines:
|
||||
|
||||
1. When defining a new resource type (new CRD) consider expected numbers
|
||||
of objects that will exist (numbers of CRs). See guidelines
|
||||
[here](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/95-custom-resource-definitions#scale-targets-for-ga).
|
||||
1. If your code needs to hold an up-to-date list of objects in memory,
|
||||
avoid repeated LIST calls if possible. Instead consider using the
|
||||
`Informer` classes that are provided in most Kubernetes client
|
||||
libraries. Informers automatically combine LIST and WATCH functionality
|
||||
to efficiently maintain an in-memory collection.
|
||||
1. If `Informer`s don't suit your needs, try to use the API Server cache
|
||||
when LISTing. To use the cache you must supply a `ResourceVersion`.
|
||||
Read the [documentation about ResourceVersions](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/api-concepts/#resource-versions) carefully to understand how it will affect the
|
||||
freshness of the data you receive.
|
||||
1. If you can't use `Informer`s AND you can't use the API Server cache,
|
||||
then be sure to [read large lists in chunks](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/api-concepts/#retrieving-large-results-sets-in-chunks).
|
||||
1. Consider the number of instances of your client application which will be running. For instance,
|
||||
there is a big difference between having
|
||||
just one controller listing objects, versus having demonsets on every node
|
||||
doing the same thing. If there will be many instances of your client application
|
||||
(either in daemonsets or some other form) you should be particularly careful
|
||||
about LIST-related load.
|
||||
|
||||
### How do you setup clusters for scalability testing?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue