Merge pull request #5453 from liggitt/wg-mt-report
Add 2021 wg-multitenancy annual report
This commit is contained in:
commit
8b51cf3983
|
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
|||
# 2021 WG Multitenancy Annual Report
|
||||
|
||||
### What was the initial mission of the group and if it's changed, how?
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial Mission:**
|
||||
|
||||
Define the models of multitenancy that Kubernetes will support. Discuss and execute upon any
|
||||
remaining work that needs to be done to support these models. Create conformance tests that
|
||||
will prove that these models can be built and used in production environments.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Mission:**
|
||||
|
||||
We are focusing more on projects using Kubernetes than trying to directly change the API machinery,
|
||||
which is a huge and potentially intractable problem. We are continuing to work on conformance
|
||||
testing as part of one of our projects.
|
||||
|
||||
### What’s the current roadmap until completion?
|
||||
|
||||
**We have three projects we are incubating:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Multi-Tenancy Benchmarks https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/tree/master/benchmarks
|
||||
* Virtual Cluster Project https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/tree/master/incubator/virtualcluster
|
||||
* Hierarchical Namespace Controller https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/tree/master/incubator/hnc
|
||||
|
||||
These are all in active development, and we’re making good progress. Google Cloud has adopted HNC in beta.
|
||||
MTB is going to be a great platform for the conformance test suite expansion. Virtual Cluster Project is
|
||||
graduating out of our incubator and into its own repo! HNC will probably follow soon.
|
||||
|
||||
The roadmap is documented in the [working group project plan](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U8RQQmTUjxgMZY05HG2f7b3KsB94BhK4Ko6aWbLNXcc/edit).
|
||||
|
||||
### Have you produced any artifacts, reports, white papers to date?
|
||||
|
||||
You can find a bunch of our docs here: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/tree/master/docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Is the group active? healthy? contributors from multiple companies and/or end user companies?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, it’s one of the most egalitarian working groups I’ve seen. We have active contributors and participants
|
||||
from all over the industry, and a lot of drive bys from consumers of Kubernetes who are just trying to
|
||||
configure clusters for multi-tenancy and have questions. Our incubating projects are led by people from
|
||||
Google, Nirmata, Alibaba, and Medtronic, have reviewers and participants from other companies, and the WG chairs work at VMware and Cisco.
|
||||
We have a very diverse group of presenters from different companies who are all trying to solve the same problems, and we all have
|
||||
the philosophy of learning from each other and sharing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Is everything in your readme accurate? posting meetings on youtube?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes and Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Do you have regular check-ins with your sponsoring SIGs?
|
||||
|
||||
We have a huge number of sponsoring SIGs, many of them send representatives to meetings on an adhoc basis.
|
||||
|
||||
### Links to the last two community meeting updates the group has given and notable highlights you’d like to share from those.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue