Merge pull request #6303 from jberkus/awardedit
Added rules clarification on who is eligible to be nominated
This commit is contained in:
commit
972223cdee
|
@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ Here are a few suggestions or ideas that make for a good award nominee:
|
|||
- Awards are affiliation-free and earned by individuals, we do not mention vendors at all as part of this process
|
||||
- Vendors are encouraged to celebrate individuals via their own social properties, the awards themselves will remain neutral
|
||||
- Spread the Wealth
|
||||
- Should consider lookin at underserved areas of the project
|
||||
- Should consider looking at underserved areas of the project
|
||||
- For every "rock star" there's probably a few people quietly doing excellent work.
|
||||
- Should consider past awards, having the same person winning the award repeatedly shouldn't be the norm.
|
||||
- As a rule, current SIG Leads, SC members, and other titled community leaders should be considered ineligible for the contributor awards, as their achievements are already recognized.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -103,4 +104,4 @@ There may be cases where the ceremony is separate or virtual, here are some tips
|
|||
- Virtual Contributor Summits
|
||||
- Usually a picture of the award is sufficient and then drop ship the rest.
|
||||
- Awardees should be made aware of logistics
|
||||
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.
|
||||
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue