Merge pull request #6303 from jberkus/awardedit

Added rules clarification on who is eligible to be nominated
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot 2022-01-05 05:52:34 -08:00 committed by GitHub
commit 972223cdee
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ Here are a few suggestions or ideas that make for a good award nominee:
- Awards are affiliation-free and earned by individuals, we do not mention vendors at all as part of this process
- Vendors are encouraged to celebrate individuals via their own social properties, the awards themselves will remain neutral
- Spread the Wealth
- Should consider lookin at underserved areas of the project
- Should consider looking at underserved areas of the project
- For every "rock star" there's probably a few people quietly doing excellent work.
- Should consider past awards, having the same person winning the award repeatedly shouldn't be the norm.
- As a rule, current SIG Leads, SC members, and other titled community leaders should be considered ineligible for the contributor awards, as their achievements are already recognized.
## Process
@ -103,4 +104,4 @@ There may be cases where the ceremony is separate or virtual, here are some tips
- Virtual Contributor Summits
- Usually a picture of the award is sufficient and then drop ship the rest.
- Awardees should be made aware of logistics
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.