Fix design-proposals links in API conventions

This commit is contained in:
hatfieldbrian 2023-02-17 03:39:12 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 29c07a141f
commit bd2ab6ed27
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ Some resources in the v1 API contain fields called **`phase`**, and associated
`message`, `reason`, and other status fields. The pattern of using `phase` is
deprecated. Newer API types should use conditions instead. Phase was
essentially a state-machine enumeration field, that contradicted [system-design
principles](../../design-proposals/architecture/principles.md#control-logic) and
principles](https://git.k8s.io/design-proposals-archive/architecture/principles.md#control-logic) and
hampered evolution, since [adding new enum values breaks backward
compatibility](api_changes.md). Rather than encouraging clients to infer
implicit properties from phases, we prefer to explicitly expose the individual
@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ only provided with reasonable effort, and is not guaranteed to not be lost.
Status information that may be large (especially proportional in size to
collections of other resources, such as lists of references to other objects --
see below) and/or rapidly changing, such as
[resource usage](../../design-proposals/scheduling/resources.md#usage-data), should be put into separate
[resource usage](https://git.k8s.io/design-proposals-archive/scheduling/resources.md#usage-data), should be put into separate
objects, with possibly a reference from the original object. This helps to
ensure that GETs and watch remain reasonably efficient for the majority of
clients, which may not need that data.