Merge pull request #1062 from justinsb/vote_for_justinsb

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Election guide: add justinsb

community/elections/2017/README.md

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Doug Davis |	IBM	| [@duglin](https://github.com/duglin)
 Ihor Dvoretskyi |	*TBA* |	[@idvoretskyi](https://github.com/idvoretskyi)
 [Ilya Dmitrichenko](errordeveloper_bio.md) |	Weave |	[@errordeveloper](https://github.com/errordeveloper)
 [Jaice Singer DuMars](jaicesingerdumars_bio.md) |	Microsoft	| [@jdumars](https://github.com/jdumars)
-Justin Santa Barbara	|	FathomDB | [@justinsb](https://github.com/justinsb)
+[Justin Santa Barbara](vote_for_justinsb.md)	|	Independent | [@justinsb](https://github.com/justinsb)
 Kris Nova |	Microsoft	| [@kris-nova](https://github.com/kris-nova)
 [Matt Farina](mattfarina_bio.md) |	Samsung SDS	 | [@mattfarina](https://github.com/mattfarina)
 Michael Rubin | Google |	[@matchstick](https://github.com/matchstick)

community/elections/2017/vote_for_justinsb.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+## Vote for justinsb!
+
+## A little about me:
+
+I have been involved with Kubernetes since before 1.0, primarily on AWS support
+(I am a lead of sig-aws), but also contributed the original multi-zone &
+NodePort support. I also started the kops project, to produce an open-source
+and consistent Kubernetes installation tool. I'm an independent, working with
+Kubernetes in my day job but not employed to contribute to it, so I contribute
+instead where I see a problem or an unmet need.
+
+## Here's why I am asking for your vote:
+
+The steering committee's most important role is to make decisions where the
+normal process has failed to reach consensus, which we expect to happen when
+reasonable Kubernetes people disagree. I believe in this event our goal should
+be to make decisions quickly and consistently. We should explain our reasoning
+clearly both to persuade (or console!) the people who held the other view, but
+also to try to establish precedent, such that we can avoid future
+disagreements. If we are trusted to make decisions, we should above all else
+strive to be predictable.
+
+As an independent I will do so wearing my own two hats: that of a developer on
+the project contributing because it is a positive personal experience, and that
+of an end-user of Kubernetes valuing a stable and straightforward product.
+
+## My manifesto:
+
+* Where the steering committee is called upon to reach decisions, make them
+quickly and consistently, with clearly articulated reasoning. We should aim to
+establish and document the Tao of Kubernetes, where we have found disagreement.
+
+* Value diversity amongst our contributor base and consider the happiness and
+productivity of contributors and our end-users as our ultimate goals; more so
+than the desires of our biggest sponsors, however welcome and well-intended
+those desires may be.
+
+* Our releases should be more focused on the end-user experience. We need to
+better empower the release-team to reject changes that destabilize a release,
+or that unnecessarily burden the end-user. We should identify and champion key
+themes in each release that give each release a clear reason. This need not be
+combative or negative, but should be done in a collaborative way by involving
+the release team earlier in each release.
+
+* We must continue to delegate responsibilities to the SIGs, but we must remain
+mindful that the goal is the success of the Kubernetes project, not of the
+individual SIGs.
+
+* We should re-examine our processes, to ensure that the cost is worthwhile.
+Where we have process whose burden outweighs the benefits, we should consider
+alternatives.
+
+* We should allow our many Kubernetes projects the freedom to experiment with
+alternative processes, so that we reap the maximum benefits from being in
+separate repositories and separately managed. We should then encourage broader
+adoption of the approaches that have proved most successful.
+
+Given the makeup of the electorate, I realize that this is not the most
+populist manifesto. But I have watched other projects fall into exactly these
+traps, and we need to ensure that our momentum does not pull us in different
+directions, but continues to translate into progress. So I appeal to you as
+individual contributors, or as custodians of an area of the project: a focus on
+our greater goal will yield a successful project that we are all happy, proud
+and honored to be part of, with more than enough responsibilities and
+opportunities to go around!  Where I personally have experienced
+dissatisfaction with the project it has usually been due to a lack of
+decision-making, and I believe an effective steering committee will unblock the
+debates that otherwise are the biggest sinks of our time and energy. I ask for
+your vote, to act as a member of a steering committee following those values.
+