Add SIG Service Catalog's current charter

We are still discussing making changes to this charter, but for now this accurately represents how we operate today

sig-service-catalog/charter.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# SIG Service Catalog Charter
+Service Catalog is a Kubernetes extension project that implements the [Open Service Broker API](https://www.openservicebrokerapi.org/) (OSBAPI).
+It allows application developers the ability to provision and consume cloud services natively from within Kubernetes.
+
+This charter adheres to the conventions described in the [Kubernetes Charter README](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/committee-steering/governance/README.md).
+
+## Scope
+
+### In scope
+
+This SIG’s main goals are:
+- Support, and adhere to, the Platform requirements of the OSBAPI specification.
+- Provide a UX for Kubernetes users that is consistent with both the OSB API specification and traditional Kubernetes user interactions.
+- Align with the OSBAPI specification as changes are made.
+- Provide feedback (bugs or feature requests) to the OSBAPI WG.
+
+### Out of scope
+
+The following, non-exhaustive, items are out of scope:
+- Operation of OSBAPI Service Brokers.
+
+## Roles
+
+- Maintainers
+  - Responsible for approving, and reviewing, pull requests.
+  - Responsible for technical planning and stewardship of the project.
+  - New maintainers are nominated by a chair and require unanimous consent by all chairs.
+  - Maintainers can be “retired” at the suggestion of a chair, and approved unanimously by the other chairs.
+
+- Chairs
+  - All maintainer’s roles.
+  - Responsible for project administration activities within the SIG and are non-technical
+    in nature, such as organizing the weekly meetings.
+  - A chair does not have more rights, or votes, than a maintainer.
+  - Responsible for reporting the SIG’s status to the appropriate Kubernetes leadership teams.
+
+## Organizational management
+
+- SIG meets every week on Zoom at 1 PM PST on Mondays
+    - Agenda [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/17xlpkoEbPR5M6P5VDzNx17q6-IPFxKyebEekCGYiIKM/edit#).
+    - Anyone is free to add new agenda items to the doc.
+    - Recordings of the calls are made available [here](https://goo.gl/ZmLNX9).
+- SIG members explicitly representing the group at conferences (SIG progress reports, deep dives, etc.)
+  should make their slides available for perusal and feedback at least 2 week in advance.
+- [Working groups](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fghxARW-doHrNmBYCijhODsGoIFawpeU4X0end-XnUI/edit#) can be initiated by any member. To create a new one, add the topic
+  to the weekly call’s agenda for discussion.
+  - These are not the same as cross-SIG working groups.
+  - Working groups exist for an undefined period of time, so that interested members
+    can meet to discuss and solve problems for our SIG.
+
+### Project management
+- Milestones are defined by SIG maintainers.
+- Anyone is free to request for a discussion of the milestones/plans during
+  a weekly call.
+- Weekly releases are typically done on Thursdays, and any member who has
+  maintainer rights is free to initiate it. _Friday releases are strongly discouraged._
+- Major releases are planned and discussed among the SIG members during
+  regular weekly calls.
+- The release process is defined [here](https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/service-catalog/wiki/Release-Process).
+- Anyone can request to work on an issue by commenting on it with `#dibs`.
+
+
+### Technical processes
+- All technical decisions are made either through issues, pull requests or
+  discussions during the weekly SIG meeting. Major decisions should be documented
+  in an issue or pull request.
+- There is no requirement that all pull requests have an associated issue.
+  However, if the PR represents a significant design decision then it is
+  recommended that it be discussed among the group to avoid unnecessary
+  coding that might not be accepted.
+- While everyone is encouraged to contribute to the discussion of
+  any topic, ultimately any changes made to the codebase must be
+  approved by the maintainers.
+- Pull requests are required to have at least 2 maintainers approve them using the `LGTM 1` and `LGTM 2` labels.
+- Pull requests that are labeled with `do not merge` or have an on-going
+  discussion must not be merged until all concerns are addressed.
+- Disagreements are mainly resolved via consensus. In the event that a common
+  decision cannot be made, then a vote among the maintainers will be taken.
+  Simple majority (>50%) wins.
+
+### Assets
+- [Source Repository](https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/service-catalog)
+- [Image Repository](https://quay.io/organization/kubernetes-service-catalog)
+  - Canary builds are published on pushes to master.
+  - Release builds (and latest) are published on tags.
+  - Chairs have access to manage this repository.
+- [Helm Repository](https://svc-catalog-charts.storage.googleapis.com)
+  - Charts are manually published after each release.
+  - Managed by Vic Iglesias (Google).
+- [svc-cat.io](https://svc-cat.io)
+  - Published on pushes to master.
+  - Site hosted with [Netlify](https://app.netlify.com/sites/svc-cat/overview).
+  - Chairs and interested maintainers have access to manage this site.
+- [CLI Binary Hosting](https://svc-cat.io/docs/install/#manual)
+  - Canary builds are published on pushes to master.
+  - Release builds (and latest) are published on tags.
+  - Files hosted on Azure blob storage.
+  - Azure account managed by Carolyn Van Slyck (Microsoft) and Aaron Schelsinger (Microsoft).
+- [Travis](https://travis-ci.org/kubernetes-incubator/service-catalog)
+  - Runs the CI builds.
+  - Maintainers have access.
+- [Jenkins](https://service-catalog-jenkins.appspot.com/)
+  - Runs end-to-end tests on a live cluster.
+  - Server managed by Michael Kibbe (Google).