Verbosely log when a user overwrites LB or IG security groups
Change SecurityGroup to SecurityGroupOverride
Allow using existing/shared Security Groups
Update tests
- added the master option back the protokube, updating the nodeup model and protokube code
- removed any comments no related to the PR as suggested
- reverted the ordering of the mutex in the AWSVolumes in protokube
The current implementation does not put any transport security on the etcd cluster. The PR provides and optional flag to enable TLS the etcd cluster
- cleaned up and fixed any formatting issues on the journey
- added two new certificates (server/client) for etcd peers and a client certificate for kubeapi and others perhaps (perhaps calico?)
- disabled the protokube service for nodes completely is not required; note this was first raised in https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/pull/3091, but figured it would be easier to place in here given the relation
- updated protokube codebase to reflect the changes, removing the master option as its no longer required
- added additional integretion tests for the protokube manifests;
- note, still need to add documentation, but opening the PR to get feedback
- one outstanding issue is the migration from http -> https for preexisting clusters, i'm gonna hit the coreos board to ask for the best options
We move everything to the models. We feature-flag it, because we
probably want to change the names etc, and we aren't going to be able to
offer smooth upgrades until that is done.
We _should_ block per port... but:
* It causes e2e tests to break
* Users expect to be able to reach pods
* If we are running an overlay, we allow all ports anyway
* Zones are now subnets
* Utility subnet is no longer part of Zone
* Bastion InstanceGroup type added instead
* Etcd clusters defined in terms of InstanceGroups, not zones
* AdminAccess split into SSHAccess & APIAccess
* Dropped unused Multizone flag