Update proposal link to point to archive
Original link says ``` Design proposals have been archived. To view the last version of this document, see the Design Proposals Archive Repo. Please remove after 2022-04-01 or the release of Kubernetes 1.24, whichever comes first. ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
b90237d9cb
commit
9823ecda09
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ flag.
|
||||||
It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top
|
It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top
|
||||||
level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each
|
level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each
|
||||||
system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to
|
system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to
|
||||||
[the design proposal](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup)
|
[the design proposal](https://git.k8s.io/design-proposals-archive/node/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup)
|
||||||
for more details on recommended control group hierarchy.
|
for more details on recommended control group hierarchy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue