Update proposal link to point to archive

Original link says
```
Design proposals have been archived.

To view the last version of this document, see the Design Proposals Archive Repo.

Please remove after 2022-04-01 or the release of Kubernetes 1.24, whichever comes first.
```
This commit is contained in:
Marco Voelz 2022-02-21 10:54:50 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent b90237d9cb
commit 9823ecda09
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ flag.
It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top
level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each
system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to
[the design proposal](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup) [the design proposal](https://git.k8s.io/design-proposals-archive/node/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup)
for more details on recommended control group hierarchy. for more details on recommended control group hierarchy.
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't