--- title: "Audit Annotations" weight: 10 --- This page serves as a reference for the audit annotations of the kubernetes.io namespace. These annotations apply to `Event` object from API group `audit.k8s.io`. {{< note >}} The following annotations are not used within the Kubernetes API. When you [enable auditing](/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/audit/) in your cluster, audit event data is written using `Event` from API group `audit.k8s.io`. The annotations apply to audit events. Audit events are different from objects in the [Event API](/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/cluster-resources/event-v1/) (API group `events.k8s.io`). {{< /note >}} ## pod-security.kubernetes.io/exempt Example: `pod-security.kubernetes.io/exempt: namespace` Value **must** be one of `user`, `namespace`, or `runtimeClass` which correspond to [Pod Security Exemption](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-admission/#exemptions) dimensions. This annotation indicates on which dimension was based the exemption from the PodSecurity enforcement. ## pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-policy Example: `pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-policy: restricted:latest` Value **must** be `privileged:`, `baseline:`, `restricted:` which correspond to [Pod Security Standard](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards) levels accompanied by a version which **must** be `latest` or a valid Kubernetes version in the format `v.`. This annotations informs about the enforcement level that allowed or denied the pod during PodSecurity admission. See [Pod Security Standards](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/) for more information. ## pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations Example: `pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations: would violate PodSecurity "restricted:latest": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "example" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), ...` Value details an audit policy violation, it contains the [Pod Security Standard](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/) level that was transgressed as well as the specific policies on the fields that were violated from the PodSecurity enforcement. See [Pod Security Standards](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/) for more information. ## authorization.k8s.io/decision Example: `authorization.k8s.io/decision: "forbid"` This annotation indicates whether or not a request was authorized in Kubernetes audit logs. See [Auditing](/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/audit/) for more information. ## authorization.k8s.io/reason Example: `authorization.k8s.io/reason: "Human-readable reason for the decision"` This annotation gives reason for the [decision](#authorization-k8s-io-decision) in Kubernetes audit logs. See [Auditing](/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/audit/) for more information. ## missing-san.invalid-cert.kubernetes.io/$hostname Example: `missing-san.invalid-cert.kubernetes.io/example-svc.example-namespace.svc: "relies on a legacy Common Name field instead of the SAN extension for subject validation"` Used by Kubernetes version v1.24 and later This annotation indicates a webhook or aggregated API server is using an invalid certificate that is missing `subjectAltNames`. Support for these certificates was disabled by default in Kubernetes 1.19, and removed in Kubernetes 1.23. Requests to endpoints using these certificates will fail. Services using these certificates should replace them as soon as possible to avoid disruption when running in Kubernetes 1.23+ environments. There's more information about this in the Go documentation: [X.509 CommonName deprecation](https://go.dev/doc/go1.15#commonname). ## insecure-sha1.invalid-cert.kubernetes.io/$hostname Example: `insecure-sha1.invalid-cert.kubernetes.io/example-svc.example-namespace.svc: "uses an insecure SHA-1 signature"` Used by Kubernetes version v1.24 and later This annotation indicates a webhook or aggregated API server is using an insecure certificate signed with a SHA-1 hash. Support for these insecure certificates is disabled by default in Kubernetes 1.24, and will be removed in a future release. Services using these certificates should replace them as soon as possible, to ensure connections are secured properly and to avoid disruption in future releases. There's more information about this in the Go documentation: [Rejecting SHA-1 certificates](https://go.dev/doc/go1.18#sha1).