--- title: Shared Resource --- ## Background In KubeVela, by default, application owns resources. It means that resources create by the application should only be controlled by the application that creates it. So there are basically two requirements for application creating resources: 1. The resource must not exist before the application creating it. It exists, there will be a resource conflict error. 2. The resource is expected to be only manageable through its creator. *Others* should not be able to modify it or edit it. While dispatching resources, the application will 1. Check if resource exists. If exists, check its labels. If `app.oam.dev/name` and `app.oam.dev/namespace` equals to the application's name and namespace, it means this resource is previously created by the same application and the dispatching operation now will become an update operation. The two labels identify the owner of the resource. 2. If resource exists, but no label found, then this resource is created before this application. At this time, the application will report a resource conflict error. 3. If resource exists, and the labels point to another application, then this resource is managed by other applications. At this time, the current application will also report a resource conflict error. With these checks, different applications cannot manage the same resource. ## Usage However, there are scenarios that these two requirements are not met. One of the scenarios is sharing across different Applications. For example, each application wants to create a ConfigMap, but their ConfigMaps are the same. To achieve that, KubeVela application could utilize the `shared-resource` policy to make it possible. ### create When one resource is created as sharing resource, one special annotation app.oam.dev/shared-by will be added to the resource. It will record the **sharer** of the resource in time order. The application that firstly creates the resource will set its owner labels to itself. Then it will add itself to the sharer annotation. ### share When another application comes and wants to share the resource, it will check if the resource is sharable, aka there is at least one sharer in the sharer annotation. If it is sharable, it will add itself to the sharer annotation, but not modify the content of the resource. ### delete With this mechanism, only the owner of the resource can modify the resource (including updating and state-keeping). Other sharer can only see that resource. When the owner of the resource is gone (application is deleted or do not use this resource anymore), it will give the owner of the application to the next sharer. If no sharer exists, it will finally delete that resource. See the following figures for details. ![shared-resource-1](../../resources/shared-resource-1.png) ![shared-resource-2](../../resources/shared-resource-2.png) ## Example ```yaml apiVersion: core.oam.dev/v1beta1 kind: Application metadata: name: app1 spec: components: - name: ns1 type: k8s-objects properties: objects: - apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: example - name: cm1 type: k8s-objects properties: objects: - apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: cm1 namespace: example data: key: value1 policies: - name: shared-resource type: shared-resource properties: rules: - selector: resourceTypes: ["Namespace"] ``` ```yaml apiVersion: core.oam.dev/v1beta1 kind: Application metadata: name: app2 spec: components: - name: ns2 type: k8s-objects properties: objects: - apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: example - name: cm2 type: k8s-objects properties: objects: - apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: cm2 namespace: example data: key: value2 policies: - name: shared-resource type: shared-resource properties: rules: - selector: resourceTypes: ["Namespace"] ``` The above two applications will dispatch the same namespace "example". They will create two different ConfigMap inside namespace "example" respectively. Both application use the shared-resource policy and declared the namespace resource as shared. In this way, there will be no conflict for creating the same namespace. If the shared-resource policy is not used, the second application will report error after it finds that the namespace "example" is managed by the first application. The namespace will only be recycled when both applications are removed.