RA doesn't need CAASERVFAILExceptions. (#1992)
In #1971 we added the CAASERVFAILExceptions config field and argument to NewDNSResolverImpl. This argument only needs to be passed to the VA, where we do CAA validations. However, I accidentally added code to the RA as well to use this new config field. This changes backs that out.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd095b8881
commit
55657fad0d
|
|
@ -68,13 +68,11 @@ func main() {
|
|||
if dnsTries < 1 {
|
||||
dnsTries = 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
caaSERVFAILExceptions, err := bdns.ReadHostList(c.VA.CAASERVFAILExceptions)
|
||||
cmd.FailOnError(err, "Couldn't read CAASERVFAILExceptions file")
|
||||
if !c.Common.DNSAllowLoopbackAddresses {
|
||||
rai.DNSResolver = bdns.NewDNSResolverImpl(
|
||||
raDNSTimeout,
|
||||
[]string{c.Common.DNSResolver},
|
||||
caaSERVFAILExceptions,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
scoped,
|
||||
clock.Default(),
|
||||
dnsTries)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue