This design seeks to reduce read-pressure on our DB by moving rate limit
tabulation to a key-value datastore. This PR provides the following:
- (README.md) a short guide to the schemas, formats, and concepts
introduced in this PR
- (source.go) an interface for storing, retrieving, and resetting a
subscriber bucket
- (name.go) an enumeration of all defined rate limits
- (limit.go) a schema for defining default limits and per-subscriber
overrides
- (limiter.go) a high-level API for interacting with key-value rate
limits
- (gcra.go) an implementation of the Generic Cell Rate Algorithm, a
leaky bucket-style scheduling algorithm, used to calculate the present
or future capacity of a subscriber bucket using spend and refund
operations
Note: the included source implementation is test-only and currently
accomplished using a simple in-memory map protected by a mutex,
implementations using Redis and potentially other data stores will
follow.
Part of #5545
This can take two values (typically the return values of a two-value
function) and panic if the error is non-nil, returning the interesting
value. This is particularly useful for cases where we statically know
the call will succeed.
Thanks to @mcpherrinm for the idea!
Adds a custom YAML unmarshaller in the `//strictyaml` package based on
`go-yaml/yaml v3` with unique key detection enabled and ensures that
target struct is able to contain all target fields.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/3344.
Simplify the control flow of the FinalizeOrder handler to make it easier
to read and reason about:
- Move all validation to before we set the order to Processing, and put
it all in a single helper funcion.
- Move almost all logEvent/trace handling directly into FinalizeOrder so
it cannot be missed.
- Flatten issueCertificate and issueCertificateInner into a single
helper function, now that they're no longer being called from both
ACMEv1 and v2 entry points.
- Other minor cleanups, such as making SolvedBy not return a pointer and
making matchesCSR private.
This paves the way for making both issueCertificateInner and failOrder
asynchronous, which we plan to do in the near future.
Part of #6575
Previously, the reloader relied on user code to log errors and changes.
But this led to gaps (for instance the RA not logging reloads of the rate
limit file). Instead, make the reloader responsible for this.
This allowed removing the error callback, at the minor cost of removing
the status gauge for the ECDSA allowlist.
Right now, Boulder expects to be able to connect to syslog, and panics
if it's not available. We'd like to be able to log to stdout/stderr as a
replacement for syslog.
- Add a detailed timestamp (down to microseconds, same as we collect in
prod via syslog).
- Remove the escape codes for colorizing output.
- Report the severity level numerically rather than with a letter prefix.
Add locking for stdout/stderr and syslog logs. Neither the [syslog] package
nor the [os] package document concurrency-safety, and the Go rule is: if
it's not documented to be concurrent-safe, it's not. Notably the [log.Logger]
package is documented to be concurrent-safe, and a look at its implementation
shows it uses a Mutex internally.
Remove places that use the singleton `blog.Get()`, and instead pass through
a logger from main in all the places that need it.
[syslog]: https://pkg.go.dev/log/syslog
[os]: https://pkg.go.dev/os
[log.Logger]: https://pkg.go.dev/log#Logger
By making this method private, we ensure that all policy
decisions go through WillingToIssueWildcards, which
attaches the failing identifier to each error message.
Fixes#2526
Part of #5816
Run the Boulder unit and integration tests with go1.19.
In addition, make a few small changes to allow both sets of
tests to run side-by-side. Mark a few tests, including our lints
and generate checks, as go1.18-only. Reformat a few doc
comments, particularly lists, to abide by go1.19's stricter gofmt.
Causes #6275
The iotuil package has been deprecated since go1.16; the various
functions it provided now exist in the os and io packages. Replace all
instances of ioutil with either io or os, as appropriate.
The gopkg.in/yaml.v2 package has a potential crash when
parsing malicious input. Although we only use the yaml
package to parse trusted configuration, update to v3 anyway.
We have decided that we don't like the if err := call(); err != nil
syntax, because it creates confusing scopes, but we have not cleaned up
all existing instances of that syntax. However, we have now found a
case where that syntax enables a bug: It caused readers to believe that
a later err = call() statement was assigning to an already-declared err
in the local scope, when in fact it was assigning to an
already-declared err in the parent scope of a closure. This caused our
ineffassign and staticcheck linters to be unable to analyze the
lifetime of the err variable, and so they did not complain when we
never checked the actual value of that error.
This change standardizes on the two-line error checking syntax
everywhere, so that we can more easily ensure that our linters are
correctly analyzing all error assignments.
Empty the bodies of the WFE's and RA's `NewAuthorization` methods. These
were used exclusively by the ACMEv1 flow. Also remove any helper functions
which were used exclusively by this code, and any tests which were testing
exclusively this code and which have equivalent tests for the ACMEv2 flow.
Greatly simply `SA.GetAuthorizations2`, as it no longer has to contend with
there being two different kinds of authorizations in the database. Add a few
TODOs to consider removing a few other SA gRPC methods which no longer
have any callers.
Part of #5681
Implement our label validation logic directly as specified in the
relevant RFCs: P-Labels are a subset of XN-Labels which are a
subset of Reserved LDH Labels which are a subset of LDH Labels.
This approach allows us to much more clearly document what each
check is doing, to remove two regular expressions, and to simplify
one additional regex.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/dev-misc-tickets/issues/247
This change adds two new test assertion helpers, `AssertErrorIs`
and `AssertErrorWraps`. The former is a wrapper around `errors.Is`,
and asserts that the error's wrapping chain contains a specific (i.e.
singleton) error. The latter is a wrapper around `errors.As`, and
asserts that the error's wrapping chain contains any error which is
of the given type; it also has the same unwrapping side effect as
`errors.As`, which can be useful for further assertions about the
contents of the error.
It also makes two small changes to our `berrors` package, namely
making `berrors.ErrorType` itself an error rather than just an int,
and giving `berrors.BoulderError` an `Unwrap()` method which
exposes that inner `ErrorType`. This allows us to use the two new
helpers above to make assertions about berrors, rather than
having to hand-roll equality assertions about their types.
Finally, it takes advantage of the two changes above to greatly
simplify many of the assertions in our tests, removing conditional
checks and replacing them with simple assertions.
errors.As checks for a specific error in a wrapped error chain
(see https://golang.org/pkg/errors/#As) as opposed to asserting
that an error is of a specific type.
Part of #5010
errors.As checks for a specific error in a wrapped error chain
(see https://golang.org/pkg/errors/#As) as opposed to asserting
that an error is of a specific type.
Part of #5010
ACME Challenges are well-known strings ("http-01", "dns-01", and
"tlsalpn-01") identifying which kind of challenge should be used
to verify control of a domain. Because they are well-known and
only certain values are valid, it is better to represent them as
something more akin to an enum than as bare strings. This also
improves our ability to ensure that an AcmeChallenge is not
accidentally used as some other kind of string in a different
context. This change also brings them closer in line with the
existing core.AcmeResource and core.OCSPStatus string enums.
Fixes#5009
This required a refactoring: Move validateEmail from the RA to ValidEmail
in the `policy` package. I also moved `ValidDomain` from a method on
PolicyAuthority to a standalone function so that ValidEmail can call it.
notify-mailer will now log invalid addresses and skip them without
attempting to send mail. Since @example.com addresses are invalid,
I updated the notify-mailer test, which used a lot of such addresses.
Also, now when notify-mailer receives an unrecoverable error sending
mail, it logs the email address and what offset within the list it was.
Prev. we weren't checking the domain portion of an email contact address
very strictly in the RA. This updates the PA to export a function that
can be used to validate the domain the same way we validate domain
portions of DNS type identifiers for issuance.
This also changes the RA to use the `invalidEmail` error type in more
places.
A new Go integration test is added that checks these errors end-to-end
for both account creation and account update.
LE is popular and aims to popularise certificate issuance. End users who see
error messages cannot be assumed to be as DNS-experienced as previously. The
user-facing error messages in the policy authority file are terse and unobvious
to the point that they are often unlikely to be well understood by those they
are intended to inform, who may be "just trying to get a LE cert for their
domain".
This change set makes the authz2 storage format the default format. It removes
most of the functionality related to the previous storage format, except for
the SA fallbacks and old gRPC methods which have been left for a follow-up
change in order to make these changes deployable without introducing
incompatibilities.
Fixes#4454.
This will allow implementing sub-problems without creating a cyclic
dependency between `core` and `problems`.
The `identifier` package is somewhat small/single-purpose and in the
future we may want to move more "ACME" bits beyond the `identifier`
types into a dedicated package outside of `core`.
Our existing hostname policy configs use JSON. We would like to switch to YAML
to match the rate limit policy configs and to support commenting/tagging
entries in the hostname policy.
The PA is updated to support both JSON and YAML while we migrate the existing
policy data to the new format. To verify there are no changes in functionality
the existing unit tests were updated to test the same policy expressed in YAML
and JSON form.
In integration tests the `config` tree continues to use a JSON hostname policy
file to test the legacy support. In `config-next` a YAML hostname policy file
is used instead.
The new YAML format allows separating out `HighRiskBlockedNames` (primarily
used to meet the requirement of managing issuance for "high risk" domains per
CABF BRs, mostly static) and `AdminBlockedNames` (used after administrative
action is taken to block a domain. Additions are made with some frequency).
Since the rate at which we change entries in these lists differs it is helpful
to separate them in the policy content.
Early ACME drafts supported a notion of "combinations" of challenges
that had to be completed together. This was removed from subsequent
drafts. Boulder has only ever supported "combinations" that exactly map
to the list of challenges, 1 for 1.
This removes all the plumbing for combinations, and adds a list of
combinations to the authz JSON right before marshaling it in WFE1.
* Remove the challenge whitelist
* Reduce the signature for ChallengesFor and ChallengeTypeEnabled
* Some unit tests in the VA were changed from testing TLS-SNI to testing the same behavior
in TLS-ALPN, when that behavior wasn't already tested. For instance timeouts during connect
are now tested.
Fixes#4109
Adds a feature which gates creation of authorizations following the style required for the new schema (and which can be used for gating the reset of our new schema code later down the road).
There was an internal discussion about an issue this creates regarding a predictable ordering of challenges within a challenge due to sequential challenge IDs which will always be static for each challenge type. It was suggested we could add some kind of obfuscation to the challenge ID when presented to the user to prevent this. This hasn't been done in this PR as it would only be focused in the WFE and would be better suited as its own changeset.
Fixes#3981.
The previous update was just [9 days ago](https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/pull/3808). However, since we merged some changes into the PSL that are related to IANA TLDs I though about providing an immediate patch.
Tests are passing:
```
➜ ~ cd ~/go/src/github.com/weppos/publicsuffix-go
➜ publicsuffix-go git:(master) GOCACHE=off go test ./...
? github.com/weppos/publicsuffix-go/cmd/load [no test files]
ok github.com/weppos/publicsuffix-go/net/publicsuffix 0.021s
ok github.com/weppos/publicsuffix-go/publicsuffix 0.034s
```
A very large number of the logger calls are of the form log.Function(fmt.Sprintf(...)).
Rather than sprinkling fmt.Sprintf at every logger call site, provide formatting versions
of the logger functions and call these directly with the format and arguments.
While here remove some unnecessary trailing newlines and calls to String/Error.
This code was never enabled in production. Our original intent was to
ship this as part of the ACMEv2 API. Before that could happen flaws were
identified in TLS-SNI-01|02 that resulted in TLS-SNI-02 being removed
from the ACME protocol. We won't ever be enabling this code and so we
might as well remove it.
Prior to this commit the comment on `pa.WillingToIssue` incorrectly
asserted that the input domain must not contain IDN labels. That's not
true anymore! 🎉
This change adds a feature flag, TLSSNIRevalidation. When it is enabled, Boulder
will create new authorization objects with TLS-SNI challenges if the requesting
account has issued a certificate with the relevant domain name, and was the most
recent account to do so*. This setting overrides the configured list of
challenges in the PolicyAuthority, so even if TLS-SNI is disabled in general, it
will be enabled for revalidation.
Note that this interacts with EnforceChallengeDisable. Because
EnforceChallengeDisable causes additional checked at validation time and at
issuance time, we need to update those two places as well. We'll send a
follow-up PR with that.
*We chose to make this work only for the most recent account to issue, even if
there were overlapping certificates, because it significantly simplifies the
database access patterns and should work for 95+% of cases.
Note that this change will let an account revalidate and reissue for a domain
even if the previous issuance on that account used http-01 or dns-01. This also
simplifies implementation, and fits within the intent of the mitigation plan: If
someone previously issued for a domain using http-01, we have high confidence
that they are actually the owner, and they are not going to "steal" the domain
from themselves using tls-sni-01.
Also note: This change also doesn't work properly with ReusePendingAuthz: true.
Specifically, if you attempted issuance in the last couple days and failed
because there was no tls-sni challenge, you'll still have an http-01 challenge
lying around, and we'll reuse that; then your client will fail due to lack of
tls-sni challenge again.
This change was joint work between @rolandshoemaker and @jsha.
This updates the PA component to allow authorization challenge types that are globally disabled if the account ID owning the authorization is on a configured whitelist for that challenge type.
This commit adds a new wildcardExactBlacklist map to the PA's
AuthorityImpl that is used by WillingToIssueWildcard to decide if
a wildcard issuance would cover a high value domain.
This prevents getting a wildcard for "*.example.com" if
"highvalue.example.com" is on the exact blacklist since it would
circumvent the intention of the exact blacklist by minting a certificate
that could be used for "highvalue.example.com".
Resolves#3239
This PR implements issuance for wildcard names in the V2 order flow. By policy, pending authorizations for wildcard names only receive a DNS-01 challenge for the base domain. We do not re-use authorizations for the base domain that do not come from a previous wildcard issuance (e.g. a normal authorization for example.com turned valid by way of a DNS-01 challenge will not be reused for a *.example.com order).
The wildcard prefix is stripped off of the authorization identifier value in two places:
When presenting the authorization to the user - ACME forbids having a wildcard character in an authorization identifier.
When performing validation - We validate the base domain name without the *. prefix.
This PR is largely a rewrite/extension of #3231. Instead of using a pseudo-challenge-type (DNS-01-Wildcard) to indicate an authorization & identifier correspond to the base name of a wildcard order name we instead allow the identifier to take the wildcard order name with the *. prefix.