- Rename `NewOrderRequest` field `LimitsExempt` to `IsARIRenewal`
- Introduce a new `NewOrderRequest` field, `IsRenewal`
- Introduce a new (temporary) feature flag, `CheckRenewalExemptionAtWFE`
WFE:
- Perform renewal detection in the WFE when `CheckRenewalExemptionAtWFE`
is set
- Skip (key-value) `NewOrdersPerAccount` and `CertificatesPerDomain`
limit checks when renewal detection indicates the the order is a
renewal.
RA:
- Leave renewal detection in the RA intact
- Skip renewal detection and (legacy) `NewOrdersPerAccount` and
`CertificatesPerDomain` limit checks when `CheckRenewalExemptionAtWFE`
is set and the `NewOrderRequest` indicates that the order is a renewal.
Fixes#7508
Part of #5545
- Shrink the number of public `ratelimits` methods by relocating two
sizeable transaction constructors. Simplify the spend and refund
call-sites in the WFE.
- Spend calls now block instead of being called asynchronously.
This allows us to give a user-meaningful error about malformed names
early on, instead of propagating internal errors from the new rate
limiting system.
This moves the well-formedness logic from `WillingToIssue` into a new
function `WellFormedDomainNames`, which calls `ValidDomain` on each name
and combines the errors into suberrors if there is more than one.
`WillingToIssue` now calls `WellFormedDomainNames` to keep the existing
behavior. Additionally, WFE calls `WellFormedDomainNames` before
checking rate limits.
This creates a slight behavior change: If an order contains both
malformed domain names and wellformed but blocked domain names,
suberrors will only be generated for the malformed domain names. This is
reflected in the changes to `TestWillingToIssue_Wildcard`.
Adds a WFE test case for receiving malformed identifiers in a new-order
request.
Follows up on #3323 and #7218Fixes#7526
Some small incidental fixes:
- checkWildcardHostList was checking `pa.blocklist` for `nil` before
accessing `pa.wildcardExactBlocklist`. Fix that.
- move table test for WillingToIssue into a new test case for
WellFormedDomainNames
- move two standalone test cases into the big table test
We had disabled our lints on go1.22 because golangci-lint and
staticcheck didn't work with some of its updates. Re-enable them, and
fix the things which the updated linters catch now.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7229
- Update the failed authorizations limit to use 'enum:regId:domain' for
transactions while maintaining 'enum:regId' for overrides.
- Modify the failed authorizations transaction builder to generate a
transaction for each order name.
- Rename the `FailedAuthorizationsPerAccount` enum to
`FailedAuthorizationsPerDomainPerAccount` to align with its corrected
implementation. This change is possible because the limit isn't yet
deployed in staging or production.
Blocks #7346
Part of #5545
- Update parsing of overrides with Ids formatted as 'fqdnSet' to produce
a hexadecimal string.
- Update validation for Ids formatted as 'fqdnSet' when constructing a
bucketKey for a transaction to validate before identifier construction.
- Skip CertificatesPerDomain transactions when the limit is disabled.
Part of #5545
- Move default and override limits, and associated methods, out of the
Limiter to new limitRegistry struct, embedded in a new public
TransactionBuilder.
- Export Transaction and add corresponding Transaction constructor
methods for each limit Name, making Limiter and TransactionBuilder the
API for interacting with the ratelimits package.
- Implement batched Spends and Refunds on the Limiter, the new methods
accept a slice of Transactions.
- Add new boolean fields check and spend to Transaction to support more
complicated cases that can arise in batches:
1. the InvalidAuthorizations limit is checked at New Order time in a
batch with many other limits, but should only be spent when an
Authorization is first considered invalid.
2. the CertificatesPerDomain limit is overridden by
CertficatesPerDomainPerAccount, when this is the case, spends of the
CertificatesPerDomain limit should be "best-effort" but NOT deny the
request if capacity is lacking.
- Modify the existing Spend/Refund methods to support
Transaction.check/spend and 0 cost Transactions.
- Make bucketId private and add a constructor for each bucket key format
supported by ratelimits.
- Move domainsForRateLimiting() from the ra.go to ratelimits. This
avoids a circular import issue in ra.go.
Part of #5545
The `Limiter` API has been adjusted significantly to both improve both
safety and ergonomics and two `Limit` types have been corrected to match
the legacy implementations.
**Safety**
Previously, the key used for looking up limit overrides and for fetching
individual buckets from the key-value store was constructed within the
WFE. This posed a risk: if the key was malformed, the default limit
would still be enforced, but individual overrides would fail to function
properly. This has been addressed by the introduction of a new
`BucketId` type along with a `BucketId` constructor for each `Limit`
type. Each constructor is responsible for producing a well-formed bucket
key which undergoes the very same validation as any potentially matching
override key.
**Ergonomics**
Previously, each of the `Limiter` methods took a `Limit` name, a bucket
identifier, and a cost to be spent/ refunded. To simplify this, each
method now accepts a new `Transaction` type which provides a cost, and
wraps a `BucketId` identifying the specific bucket.
The two changes above, when taken together, make the implementation of
batched rate limit transactions considerably easier, as a batch method
can accept a slice of `Transaction`.
**Limit Corrections**
PR #6947 added all of the existing rate limits which could be made
compatible with the key-value approach. Two of these were improperly
implemented;
- `CertificatesPerDomain` and `CertificatesPerFQDNSet`, were implemented
as
- `CertificatesPerDomainPerAccount` and
`CertificatesPerFQDNSetPerAccount`.
Since we do not actually associate these limits with a particular ACME
account, the `regID` portion of each of their bucket keys has been
removed.