Fixes#976.
This implements a new rate limit, InvalidAuthorizationsPerAccount. If a given account fails authorization for a given hostname too many times within the window, subsequent new-authz attempts for that account and hostname will fail early with a rateLimited error. This mitigates the misconfigured clients that constantly retry authorization even though they always fail (e.g., because the hostname no longer resolves).
For the new rate limit, I added a new SA RPC, CountInvalidAuthorizations. I chose to implement this only in gRPC, not in AMQP-RPC, so checking the rate limit is gated on gRPC. See #2406 for some description of the how and why. I also chose to directly use the gRPC interfaces rather than wrapping them in core.StorageAuthority, as a step towards what we will want to do once we've moved fully to gRPC.
Because authorizations don't have a created time, we need to look at the expires time instead. Invalid authorizations retain the expiration they were given when they were created as pending authorizations, so we use now + pendingAuthorizationLifetime as one side of the window for rate limiting, and look backwards from there. Note that this means you could maliciously bypass this rate limit by stacking up pending authorizations over time, then failing them all at once.
Similarly, since this limit is by (account, hostname) rather than just (hostname), you can bypass it by creating multiple accounts. It would be more natural and robust to limit by hostname, like our certificate limits. However, we currently only have two indexes on the authz table: the primary key, and
(`registrationID`,`identifier`,`status`,`expires`)
Since this limit is intended mainly to combat misconfigured clients, I think this is sufficient for now.
Corresponding PR for website: letsencrypt/website#125
The only consumer of `core/reverse-name.go` and the `core.ReverseName`
function was the SA. In keeping with minimizing the junk that collects
up in `core` this commit moves `core.ReverseName` into the SA as the
unexported `reverseName` function. There was no unit test for
`ReverseName` so this commit also adds a unit test to `sa_test.go`.
`CountPendingAuthorizations` wasn't updated when we added authorization deactivation which means deactivated authorizations count towards the pending authorization limit. This PR adds a `AND status = 'pending'` clause to the existing SQL query.
Currently there is no index on the `status` column but as we are already filtering using the `registrationID, expires` index this doesn't have a significant impact on the query performance.
Fixes#2309.
This commit updates the `go-jose` dependency to [v1.1.0](https://github.com/square/go-jose/releases/tag/v1.1.0) (Commit: aa2e30fdd1fe9dd3394119af66451ae790d50e0d). Since the import path changed from `github.com/square/...` to `gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1/` this means removing the old dep and adding the new one.
The upstream go-jose library added a `[]*x509.Certificate` member to the `JsonWebKey` struct that prevents us from using a direct equality test against two `JsonWebKey` instances. Instead we now must compare the inner `Key` members.
The `TestRegistrationContactUpdate` function from `ra_test.go` was updated to populate the `Key` members used in testing instead of only using KeyID's to allow the updated comparisons to work as intended.
The `Key` field of the `Registration` object was switched from `jose.JsonWebKey` to `*jose.JsonWebKey ` to make it easier to represent a registration w/o a Key versus using a value with a nil `JsonWebKey.Key`.
I verified the upstream unit tests pass per contributing.md:
```
daniel@XXXXX:~/go/src/gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1$ git show
commit aa2e30fdd1fe9dd3394119af66451ae790d50e0d
Merge: 139276c e18a743
Author: Cedric Staub <cs@squareup.com>
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:08:11 2016 -0700
Merge branch 'master' into v1
* master:
Better docs explaining embedded JWKs
Reject invalid embedded public keys
Improve multi-recipient/multi-sig handling
daniel@XXXXX:~/go/src/gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1$ go test ./...
ok gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1 17.599s
ok gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1/cipher 0.007s
? gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1/jose-util [no test files]
ok gopkg.in/square/go-jose.v1/json 1.238s
```
This PR reverts 27d531101f and undoes the merge of the `pendingAuthorizations` and `authz` table. This change had unintended performance impacts on the `CountPendingAuthorizations` query that exacerbated load issues and need to be addressed.
A number of SA functions used Go's named return value support. This can
make the code harder to follow and the Boulder style has moved to always
favouring normal returns.
This commit replaces all of the named return usage with traditional
returns and resolves#2248.
Along the way I updated a `// TODO` in `AddCertificate()` that was less
accurate than it could be. This resolves#2265.
In #2178 we moved to explicit `SELECT` statements using a set of `const`
fields for each type to support db migrations and forward compatibility.
This commit removes the temptation to interpolate queries by providing
convenience `SelectFoo` functions for each type allowing the caller to
provide the `WHERE` clause and arguments.
Resolves#2214.
To remove challenges with expired/pending authz's when they are deleted we want to introduce a foreign key relationship to the challenges table's authorizationID field with instruction to cascade on delete (#2155). As pointed out in a comment this is made difficult by the current usage of a separate pendingAuthorizations table for pending authorizations.
To be able to remove the pendingAuthorizations table entirely (#2163) we need to first stop using it. This PR introduces the code changes required to achieve this.
Notes:
The SA's NewPendingAuthorization function was updated to store all new pending auths in the authz table and to ensure the status is StatusPending.
The SA's GetAuthorization, UpdatePendingAuthorization, FinalizeAuthorization, and RevokeAuthorizationsByDomain functions were updated to properly handle the fact that a pending authz could be in either the pendingAuthorizations table, or the authz table, and to do the right thing accordingly.
Several places in the RA unit tests created a pending authorization with a status "Valid", then finalized it later. This broke when NewPendingAuthorization was changed to enforce Pending status before creating the authz row since the FinalizeAuthorization code expected to only finalize Valid rows. To fix this some of the RA unit tests were changed to explicitly set status to Valid before calling FinalizeAuthorization. This matches the true intention of the tests to quickly create a pending & then finalized authorization.
The expired-authz-purger utility was updated to purge from both the pendingAuthorizations and authz table as required.
The return values of RevokeAuthorizationsByDomain have changed slightly. Previously it returned a 2 element array where the first element was the number of pending authorizations revoked and the second element was the number of finalized authorizations revoked. This is changed so that now it is the number of rows from the pendingAuthorizations and authz tables respectively. E.g. the second count for the authz table may now include non-finalized authzs in its count of affected rows. The admin-revoker is the only place that used this SA method and it was updated appropriately to describe the "rows" change.
The "purger" database user needs to have a new GRANT SELECT, DELETE for the authz table in addition to its existing GRANT for the pendingAuthorizations table.
This resolves#2162
This PR adds a migration to create two new fields on the `certificateStatus` table: `notAfter` and `isExpired`. The rationale for these fields is explained in #1864. Usage of these fields is gated behind `features.CertStatusOptimizationsMigrated` per [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#gating-migrations). This flag should be set to true **only** when the `20160817143417_CertStatusOptimizations.sql` migration has been applied.
Points of difference from #2132 (the initial preparatory "all-in-one go" PR):
**Note 1**: Updating the `isExpired` field in the OCSP updater can not be done yet, the `notAfter` field needs to be fully populated first - otherwise a separate query or a messy `JOIN` would have to be used to determine if a certStatus `isExpired` by using the `certificates` table's `expires` field.
**Note 2**: Similarly we can't remove the `JOIN` on `certificates` from the `findStaleOCSPResponse` query yet until all DB rows have `notAfter` populated. This will happen in a separate **Part Two** PR.
Fixes#2160.
When we use Gorp's built-in `Get` method, it generates `SELECT *` queries. If we do a migration without a simultaneous change of the data structure, Gorp will subsequently error out when it sees a column in the output of the `SELECT *` which doesn't have a corresponding field in the struct it is trying to marshal. In order to be forward compatible with schema changes, we need to always use `SELECT a, b, c`, where `a`, `b`, and `c` are columns / fields in the current struct.
Fixes#140.
This patch allows users to specify the following revocation reasons based on my interpretation of the meaning of the codes but could use confirmation from others.
* unspecified (0)
* keyCompromise (1)
* affiliationChanged (3)
* superseded (4)
* cessationOfOperation (5)
In https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/pull/774 we introduced and account key stored with the challenge. This was a stopgap fix to the now-defunct SimpleHTTP and DNS challenges in the face of https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/F71iz6qq1o_QPVhJCV4dqWf-4Yc. However, we no longer offer or implement those challenges, so the extra field is unnecessary. It also take up a huge amount of space in the challenges table, which is our biggest table. SimpleHTTP and DNS challenges were removed in https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/pull/1247.
We can provide a follow-up migration to delete the column later, once we have a plan for large migrations without downtime.
Fixes#1909
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews