Add a new custom lint which sends CRLs to PKIMetal, and configure it to
run in our integration test environment. Factor out most of the code
used to talk to the PKIMetal API so that it can be shared by the two
custom lints which do so. Add the ability to configure lints to the
CRLProfileConfig, so that zlint knows where to load the necessary custom
config from.
Replace the bpkilint container with a new bpkimetal container. Update
our custom lint which calls out to that API to speak PKIMetal's (very
similar) protocol instead. Update our zlint custom configuration to
configure this updated lint.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/8009
Increase pkilint timeout from 200ms to 2s. In #8006 I found that errors
were stemming from timeouts talking to the bpkilint container. These
probably showed up in TestRevocation particularly because that
integration test now issues for many certificates in parallel. Pkilint's
slowness, combined with the relatively small number of cores in CI,
probably resulted in some requests taking too long.
Add a new "LintConfig" item to the CA's config, which can point to a
zlint configuration toml file. This allows lints to be configured, e.g.
to control the number of rounds of factorization performed by the Fermat
factorization lint.
Leverage this new config to create a new custom zlint which calls out to
a configured pkilint API endpoint. In config-next integration tests,
configure the lint to point at a new pkilint docker container.
This approach has three nice forward-looking features: we now have the
ability to configure any of our lints; it's easy to expand this
mechanism to lint CRLs when the pkilint API has support for that; and
it's easy to enable this new lint if we decide to stand up a pkilint
container in our production environment.
No production configuration changes are necessary at this time.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7430
Aaron Gable